Re: [stir] Draft agenda: STIR @ IETF90

"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Wed, 16 July 2014 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7491A000E for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:29:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.267
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.267 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WsaY6Q4jrjA1 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com (mx0b-0018ba01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F48E1A000B for <stir@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 09:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049401.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049401.ppops.net-0018ba01. (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id s6GG6WkX007144; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:29:24 -0400
Received: from stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([156.154.17.216]) by m0049401.ppops.net-0018ba01. with ESMTP id 1n5v8m04jm-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:29:23 -0400
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.252]) by stntexhc12.cis.neustar.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 12:29:21 -0400
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: [stir] Draft agenda: STIR @ IETF90
Thread-Index: AQHPmgcs4s5xjvp/lkOQylfjwwvTg5ujGAkA///aGf4=
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:29:20 +0000
Message-ID: <2D5EFBA9-95D4-42B6-83B0-9682A2FD3D89@neustar.biz>
References: <53BAD5C4.70701@nostrum.com>, <00b501cfa104$87f36490$97da2db0$@shockey.us>
In-Reply-To: <00b501cfa104$87f36490$97da2db0$@shockey.us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5600 definitions=7500 signatures=670481
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 kscore.is_bulkscore=4.08105527149871e-09 kscore.compositescore=0 circleOfTrustscore=0 compositescore=0.993311949948012 urlsuspect_oldscore=0.993311949948012 suspectscore=0 recipient_domain_to_sender_totalscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 kscore.is_spamscore=0 recipient_to_sender_totalscore=0 recipient_domain_to_sender_domain_totalscore=0 rbsscore=0.993311949948012 spamscore=0 recipient_to_sender_domain_totalscore=0 urlsuspectscore=0.9 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1402240000 definitions=main-1407160185
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/vis-0XWOfC7YV6lt6csa5-jiYVc
Cc: "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [stir] Draft agenda: STIR @ IETF90
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:29:27 -0000

We just want to have a discussion in the room about the way forward - specifying one credential solution or many, whether or not we want a reqs doc, those sorts of questions. We're not seeking consensus on a solution yet, if that's the concern.

Jon Peterson
Neustar, Inc.

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 16, 2014, at 7:45 AM, "Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> wrote:
> 
> 
> Is there any more information on what "credentials roadmap" is planning on ?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stir [mailto:stir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 1:16 PM
> To: stir@ietf.org
> Subject: [stir] Draft agenda: STIR @ IETF90
> 
> We requested 2 hrs, and ended up with 2.5.
> I don't think we need the extra .5, so this draft is still 120 minutes:
> 
> 5m Administrivia (chairs)
> 5m Update on status of problem-statement and threats (chairs) 90m
> draft-ietf-stir-rfc4474bis (Jon Peterson) 20m Credentials Roadmap (Sean
> Turner)
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
>