Re: [stir] AD Review: draft-ietf-stir-rph-02

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6662B1289B0; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:52:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XJ12GAOS8kZK; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BF7A12700F; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:52:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w0MIqVrU085830 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:52:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: STIR Chairs <stir-chairs@ietf.org>, "stir@ietf.org" <stir@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-stir-rph.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-stir-rph.all@tools.ietf.org>
References: <fc330584-a4aa-6a42-322e-50fbe587784b@nostrum.com> <8632F2B7-931B-47D8-B892-3DFF9AD02F0D@ericsson.com> <e32a0879-6aa4-a34e-824d-4dbe5c45d83a@nostrum.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C134AE5@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <49f4d7c2-934c-94d2-e71f-1574e04762b6@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:52:26 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B6C134AE5@ESESSMB109.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------794E3503D0EBF92EF7F21B10"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/w9EjocWPenl0XiD08DJ8uabJWNo>
Subject: Re: [stir] AD Review: draft-ietf-stir-rph-02
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:52:37 -0000

On 1/22/18 12:46 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> I wonder if the problem(s) with using multiple Identity header fields 
> are divert-specific, or if they also apply to other passport extensions.
>

The issue with -divert- is that you have a semantic stack of 
destinations, rather than a variety of PASSporTs that can assert 
different things about the call. Nesting is specific to the -divert- use 
case.

/a