Re: [Stox] Maturity of the documents
Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> Wed, 19 June 2013 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EE721F9ABA for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:31:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.160, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_MLH_Stock1=0.87, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iLiAAq91VjnZ for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-f53.google.com (mail-qe0-f53.google.com [209.85.128.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878DC21F9976 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 1so3304768qee.12 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AKg4AqX/VGQFHdmXsY5gnr5ZbZeHcAIZOjj0t7Yntxs=; b=wsuxXBgb0uRpqstAFR9eycZ8OXvHnMow3n4WAsMcG9ttnMIKxB7C5hJp4n6S2FAQVQ rjthZ9t0t3E5e2gdGe08eGhZf/13j8VrKC97JSffeVr2E91h5Wy3qr5iOi+zKVNOvpXv pR3kMK0MGMvI9aUZMfjvryxxu6OuelNsxX5Ed9HlR4h/akTRr98JfSUSaiO/Z4HZ5O3k WpbGRAzdlHnKrEIY3vM1xrwKfFFxM8vYIvlQdWLpt5upM9eTwcvhWSE/784nVnLg2UqI xk6VgGoNjF331nKAQM5+mavlI3Sb6jjkrHAG5ea5/KiKP9T5DVvEUBXEV9nlimmLZnIb CBwQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.180.133 with SMTP id bu5mr4067695qab.50.1371652267814; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.49.76.167 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:31:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN79+feMPbe3cEHhSxw-D6KLPcsfWH5kVv-4_KmPuSsC2g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E44893DD4E290745BB608EB23FDDB7620A01C7FC@008-AM1MPN1-042.mgdnok.nokia.com> <CAHBDyN79+feMPbe3cEHhSxw-D6KLPcsfWH5kVv-4_KmPuSsC2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:31:07 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHBDyN5veAfm-EUZmkF8c4sLDB=eM9FM8GXT8n1OUgySu8C-RQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
To: "markus.isomaki@nokia.com" <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] Maturity of the documents
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:31:23 -0000
Sorry - I should have read all the emails as I see the deadline in this email: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/stox/current/msg00058.html So, maybe just be explicit that this is the deadline for any alternative proposals. Thanks, Mary. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com> wrote: > I fully support this proposal. Although, there were concerns raised > during chartering that it seemed that the WG would just fell swoop > adopt this documents - I personally feel that enough time has elapsed > for someone to do that if they had the intention. But, it might be > good to set a deadline on this proposal for adopting these as WG > documents and make that the same deadline for anyone with alternative > proposals towards the milestones. > > Regards, > Mary. > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:01 AM, <Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> >> The chairs have started a consensus call on adopting the >> ‘draft-saintandre-sip-xmpp-’ documents as WG items. Please send your >> feedback on it by replying to the separate mail about the topic. >> >> >> >> Somewhat independently of the WG adoption, here is my current understanding >> of the maturity of these documents (as a co-chair). This is based on my own >> reading as well as discussion with some of the co-authors. >> >> >> >> These documents seem to be in a good shape and will mainly just need >> reviews: >> >> >> >> saintandre-sip-xmpp-core >> >> saintandre-sip-xmpp-presence >> >> saintandre-sip-xmpp-im >> >> saintandre-sip-xmpp-chat >> >> >> >> This document still has open issues. The co-authors are already working on >> an update, but further work will still be needed: >> >> >> >> saintandre-sip-xmpp-groupchat >> >> >> >> This document requires most work still. It is in my understanding the most >> complex piece of these mappings: >> >> >> >> saintandre-sip-xmpp-media >> >> >> >> This is just a very informal categorization and people are of course welcome >> to raise any issues or send improvement suggestions with any of these >> documents still even if we adopt them as WG documents. >> >> >> >> Markus >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> stox mailing list >> stox@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox >>
- [Stox] Maturity of the documents Markus.Isomaki
- Re: [Stox] Maturity of the documents Mary Barnes
- Re: [Stox] Maturity of the documents Mary Barnes
- Re: [Stox] Maturity of the documents Peter Saint-Andre