IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [straw] draft-straw-sip-traceroute-00

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Sat, 20 July 2013 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: straw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: straw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB4B21E80B3 for <straw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.254
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.254 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.183, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Im+aINodQUoG for <straw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4664D21F9991 for <straw@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.51]) by qmta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2hG41m00416LCl058hPB8Q; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:23:11 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2hPB1m00Z3ZTu2S3ShPB09; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:23:11 +0000
Message-ID: <51EAC77E.9020507@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 13:23:10 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: straw@ietf.org
References: <20130715025957.14214.78161.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CCF95343-A61C-48B3-AF57-8A05CD466498@oracle.com> <51E436DD.7020208@alum.mit.edu> <57AD32EC-09E1-4A48-8E4A-0805B3219DDD@oracle.com> <51E46D97.5040802@alum.mit.edu> <95591D74-52E9-47C3-97FC-1E52201CDAC2@oracle.com> <51E56F20.7060707@alum.mit.edu> <576A8B541C219D4E9CEB1DF8C19C7B88196BD0F4@MBX07.citservers.local> <51E99205.2010502@alum.mit.edu> <576A8B541C219D4E9CEB1DF8C19C7B88196BD262@MBX07.citservers.local> <3479332D-6CDC-4E4C-B6D3-C298D8B873D2@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <3479332D-6CDC-4E4C-B6D3-C298D8B873D2@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1374340991; bh=ZyZoUfv8/15M6vCF6mKnhtkaXHI7zOqAionyt/OP6zc=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=fyW8E9PuqKOo6LKw8kz7Dh6BakpffORcUn+GIJ30Fu1li6mHwlQWDUrHQ/i/YOsD3 fnzZtUE2uQhvNGPakw8LbrALvODDYxA9oW5DdzYWeWpzIfl4GurS+D6TXqi5a7Qjy+ xl+JQWlGMsPJYfdCqu8mbwxjf0tWb+fat0FBUB0BvQxXOYDToSrJMJhXnyoBxwAHau X1BWMHbyQzuWlvmgxh5y2R96Pr5Kfz8b2YKWAf6G8GhrkLBPxEBvAVZ8XfFzTfHsxL 9MUwyis3R1O57SuVxY9isZx4GxWI3v7jLrIw1Ne2mrzTFdD+LhKvB5lkAkCZvpiRDb 80Jxz+F3TSZaQ==
Subject: Re: [straw] draft-straw-sip-traceroute-00
X-BeenThere: straw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Sip Traversal Required for Applications to Work \(STRAW\) working group discussion list" <straw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/straw>, <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/straw>
List-Post: <mailto:straw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/straw>, <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:23:22 -0000

On 7/20/13 10:46 AM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>
> On Jul 20, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Brett Tate <brett@broadsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yes.  The current proposal is for the middle box to send both 205 and the Reason header but allow the UAC to interpret the situation based upon either mechanism since another middle might remove the Reason header or change the 205 into a 200.
>
> Well that's our unofficial reason for doing it - the official rationale would be the 205 indicates that some other system/UAC than the intended target is answering the request, and the Reason header indicats why it's answering the request.
>
> See it sounds so reasonable, doesn't it?  :)

Sounds reasonable to me.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email