IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [straw] WGLC status of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-taxonomy-00

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Mon, 21 January 2013 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <btv1==733199ea5bb==HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: straw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: straw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A475C21F8658 for <straw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:14:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SGM+erWqF5ux for <straw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:14:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.acmepacket.com (mx1.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8FE21F8651 for <straw@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:14:17 -0800 (PST)
X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1358792056-03fc200e93ea2f30001-uMHarY
Received: from Mail1.acmepacket.com (mail1.acmepacket.com [10.0.0.21]) by mx1.acmepacket.com with ESMTP id 7Bt2CpcW7nWgubxu (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:14:16 -0500 (EST)
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: HKaplan@acmepacket.com
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.67]) by Mail1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.214]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:14:16 -0500
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [straw] WGLC status of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-taxonomy-00
X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [straw] WGLC status of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-taxonomy-00
Thread-Index: AQHN+AMeKAOhCXywT0yFBg66hgcWPQ==
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:14:15 +0000
Message-ID: <BA5FE304-3035-4570-9B2E-71F1E7D12498@acmepacket.com>
References: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B0C3DF6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B0C3DF6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.0.0.30]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BA5FE304303545709B2E71F1E7D12498acmepacketcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Barracuda-Connect: mail1.acmepacket.com[10.0.0.21]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1358792056
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES128-SHA
X-Barracuda-URL: http://spam.acmepacket.com:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at acmepacket.com
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.120504 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
Cc: "straw@ietf.org" <straw@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [straw] WGLC status of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-taxonomy-00
X-BeenThere: straw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Sip Traversal Required for Applications to Work \(STRAW\) working group discussion list" <straw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/straw>, <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/straw>
List-Post: <mailto:straw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/straw>, <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 18:14:44 -0000

I got responses to my responses from Mary and Andy but not Paul, so I was waiting on that.  Would you prefer I just submit another rev with the resolutions from Mary and Andy?

-hadriel


On Jan 21, 2013, at 3:46 AM, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com<mailto:christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>> wrote:

[As co-chair]

Hi,

I noted that Hadriel was ok with most of the WGLC comments given for the b2bua-taxonomy document.

However, he did have some questions/comments on some of the WGLC comments, and there were some e-mails sent.

However, unless I’ve missed something, nothing has been sent since January 3rd.

So, what is the status? Can Hadriel submit a new version of the document, based on the WGLC comments, which we will then move forward. Or, are there still some issues which need to be discussed?

Regards,

Christer

_______________________________________________
straw mailing list
straw@ietf.org<mailto:straw@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/straw

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email