Re: [Suit] Value of COSE_Mac_Tagged/COSE_Sign_Tagged/COSE_Mac0_Tagged/COSE_Sign1_Tagged

[Akira Tsukamoto <[e-mail]>]

Hi Jim,

I think I started figure out what was going on.

The RFC8152 describes as:
  COSE_Mac_Tagged   = #6.97(COSE_Mac)
  COSE_Sign_Tagged  = #6.98(COSE_Sign)
  COSE_Mac0_Tagged  = #6.17(COSE_Mac0)
  COSE_Sign1_Tagged = #6.18(COSE_Sign1)

and I was confused with the #6 and the brackets on the right side.
After reading the implementation of tinycbor and IANA,

Tinycbor
https://github.com/intel/tinycbor/blob/master/src/tags.txt
IANA
https://www.iana.org/assignments/cbor-tags/cbor-tags.xhtml

probably it is

  COSE_Mac_Tagged   = #6.97(COSE_Mac)

means that

  CBOR Tag is 97

and uses

COSE_Mac = [
    Headers,
    payload : bstr / nil,
    tag : bstr,
    recipients :[+COSE_recipient]
]

and the examples is,

    97(
      [
        / protected / h'a1010f' / {
            \ alg \ 1:15 \ AES-CBC-MAC-256//64 \
          } / ,
        / unprotected / {},
        / payload / 'This is the content.',
        / tag / h'9e1226ba1f81b848',
        / recipients / [
          [
            / protected / h'',
            / unprotected / {
              / alg / 1:-6 / direct /,
              / kid / 4:'our-secret'
            },
            / ciphertext / h''
          ]
        ]
      ]
    )


Thanks,

-Akira


On 4/9/20 12:45, Jim Schaad wrote:
> These values are defined in RFC 8152,  draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct or
> in the IANA registry.
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suit <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Akira Tsukamoto
> Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 6:59 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [Suit] Value of
> COSE_Mac_Tagged/COSE_Sign_Tagged/COSE_Mac0_Tagged/COSE_Sign1_Tagged
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am not sure this is the right place to ask.
> 
> This is the feedback from the TEEP-wg after the virtual hackathon and
> interim meeting.
> 
> TEEP was using
> COSE_Mac_Tagged/COSE_Sign_Tagged/COSE_Mac0_Tagged/COSE_Sign1_Tagged.
> Are these tags defined the value in some drafts or iana?
> When we were trying to implement the teep, we could not put the bstr or
> int/uint for the tags.
> 
> I the draft-ietf-suit-manifest-01, it also using these tags in page 43,
> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Fdraft-ietf-suit-manifest-01&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cakira.tsukamoto%40aist.go.jp%7Cdddac6fb0a33483c20b308d7dc387820%7C18a7fec8652f409b8369272d9ce80620%7C0%7C0%7C637220007412654750&amp;sdata=knhFlGCBf5M1hwal1kdnGXinEa2ROXc7cxau7GN5uOs%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> as
> 
> SUIT_Authentication_Wrapper = [ + (
>       COSE_Mac_Tagged /
>       COSE_Sign_Tagged /
>       COSE_Mac0_Tagged /
>       COSE_Sign1_Tagged)
> ]
> 
> COSE_Mac_Tagged = any
> COSE_Sign_Tagged = any
> COSE_Mac0_Tagged = any
> COSE_Sign1_Tagged = any
> 
> It was deleted in teep at the link bellow of the pull request after the
> discussion from the hackathon,
> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fietf-teep%2Fteep-protocol%2Fcommit%2F151e72b0ea3ab8ff8f59ea4200&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cakira.tsukamoto%40aist.go.jp%7Cdddac6fb0a33483c20b308d7dc387820%7C18a7fec8652f409b8369272d9ce80620%7C0%7C0%7C637220007412654750&amp;sdata=QDJd5wiBo6p2c3Z0qc9eWvKbVBkO0kA%2FhmwCcxf1O%2FU%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 4180d90006f8c9
> but would be nice to know if it was OK with similar bellow,
> 
> COSE_Mac_Tagged = 1
> COSE_Sign_Tagged = 2
> COSE_Mac0_Tagged = 3
> COSE_Sign1_Tagged = 4
> 
> Thanks,
> -Akira
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Suit mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsuit&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cakira.tsukamoto%40aist.go.jp%7Cdddac6fb0a33483c20b308d7dc387820%7C18a7fec8652f409b8369272d9ce80620%7C0%7C0%7C637220007412654750&amp;sdata=e3YPByN13RYRMDIturl6CD5D3wue1cFaHntsxh115RQ%3D&amp;reserved=0
>