Re: [Suit] Request a presentation slot for IETF 106.

[Jong-Hyouk Lee <[e-mail]>]

Thx. Plz, see inline.
--
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University

#email: [e-mail]
#webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon

> 2019. 11. 5. 오전 10:37, Dave Thaler <[e-mail]> 작성:
> 
> Acknowledging receipt of your request, thanks for contributing to the working group.
>  
> FYI, our usual priority order in granting slots is:
> 1)     Working Group documents
> 2)     Individual submissions that have gotten technical discussion on the list
> 3)     Anything else
>  
> So I would encourage you to start a discussion on the list since your request is currently in the third category.
> I see you said “Draft reference: not yet submitted”, does the “yet” mean you plan to submit one?
> The Internet-Draft deadline was only 40 minutes after I got your email, so just asking whether you
> submitted one, or plan to in the future, or intend to use some reference that isn’t an Internet-Draft.

We may not have an Internet-draft discussed enough before the meeting, but we plan to submit it soon.

>  
> Also for myself (not sure about my co-chairs) I tend to prefer only granting slots that are at least 10 minutes long,
> since the purpose is to have time for feedback or discussion.

Sure, a slot with 10 minutes is good for us!

>  
> Do you plan to be in Singapore or will you be remote?

I will not be there (due to other works), but my student will be there to make a presentation.

Cheers!

>  
> Dave
>  
> From: Jong-Hyouk Lee <[e-mail]> 
> Sent: Monday, November 4, 2019 3:18 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: Dave Thaler <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; Russ Housley <[e-mail]>; 최서윤<[e-mail]>
> Subject: Request a presentation slot for IETF 106.
>  
> Dear SUIT chairs, 
>  
> I would like to request a slot to discuss about the following proposal. 
>  
> ---------------
> The title of the presentation: Distributed SUIT Architecture Model
> Presenter name: Seoyun Choi
> Time needed: 5min
> Draft reference: not yet submitted
> ---------------
>  
> The current SUIT architecture has shortcomings 
> - Yet adopted a traditional client and server model
> - Still cannot deal with an “author-disappearing issue”
>  
> In the proposed distributed SUIT architecture model provides
> - Distributed storage (database) for manifest
> - Irreversibility and integrity for manifest
>  
> Cheers.
> --
> Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
> Protocol Engineering Lab., Sangmyung University
>  
> #email: [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
> #webpage: https://sites.google.com/site/hurryon <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsites.google.com%2Fsite%2Fhurryon&data=02%7C01%7Cdthaler%40microsoft.com%7C9dd4726d61e34afbb9ca08d7617d381d%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637085063306200853&sdata=bWJeoSm6zODAW4bW8z9KMvOgkDM1aTpbR4ehO1l6nmg%3D&reserved=0>