Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 04 December 2019 19:02 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: suit@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844F6120964 for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:02:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KIUu8IkWTNlr for <suit@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:02:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 656C5120971 for <suit@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 11:02:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326D43818F; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:58:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9575AAAB; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:02:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
cc: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>, "suit@ietf.org" <suit@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR08MB5360CF7EFDF7C550D0D7E755FA5D0@VI1PR08MB5360.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR08MB53600B1D1A194F49B67B90DFFAC60@VI1PR08MB5360.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <20191127203651.GA117656@davidb.org> <CANK0pbaWkn7w2swRgkOqsTubE1os=rDo2BLjrTZ5eW6ePv3WnA@mail.gmail.com> <20191129183627.GA16289@davidb.org> <DB6PR0801MB1879D9742622EA0AE08A8B72EA430@DB6PR0801MB1879.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CABNHR1yEFvgEzHjBhpqTW-FX+LQTVYuSJE_9SP9OMwzjWsdORQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANK0pbaf8TTtMOSKHD0D-73+MCzSdjk7p+6hVO0WzpSxhF2fVg@mail.gmail.com> <CABNHR1z4N=uH9d5DvyYi17DCULqu3T6Ve9k-_EJr-37zUjF-uw@mail.gmail.com> <CANK0pbYGbzu8VAr7ZuzUOY1yQ75qkMKQ6PAncZCfkH2=RZWNUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABNHR1wOXx6QRYMMFgnNs12qtc5Ofs8MdR-Oe=d4KRCzXtaiQA@mail.gmail.com> <CANK0pbagZtjzE4vsW6ez76aT2sFeNj_vMr=fKP8Xo6kvCcSF9A@mail.gmail.com> <VI1PR08MB5360CF7EFDF7C550D0D7E755FA5D0@VI1PR08MB5360.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 14:02:29 -0500
Message-ID: <5719.1575486149@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/suit/y0PqvlWx5XSbsveX9r1FEAWgs6Q>
Subject: Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper
X-BeenThere: suit@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Software Updates for Internet of Things <suit.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/suit/>
List-Post: <mailto:suit@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/suit>, <mailto:suit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 19:02:39 -0000
Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote: > The signature verification was performed with the HACL library (ed25519) on > an ARM Cortex-M0+ and took approx. 7 seconds -- so yes, pretty long indeed, > in this case. > [SS] Does that scale linearly with image size? Do memory requirements (RAM > usage) increase with the image size? I guess what we want to know is how much of that 7s time was the ED25519 operation, and how much time was the hash calculation. Only the hash calculation would scale with the image size. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper David Brown
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper David Brown
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Brendan Moran
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Szymon Słupik
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Szymon Słupik
- [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Suit] Firmware Update Paper Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Szymon Słupik
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Szymon Słupik
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Michael Richardson
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Koen
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper Szymon Słupik
- Re: [Suit] Fwd: Firmware Update Paper David Brown