Re: [sunset4] Action required: IETF 89 London agenda

[Simon Perreault <[e-mail]>]

Le 2014-01-09 09:45, George, Wes a écrit :
> Folks, we need to request a meeting timeslot for London by 17th January.
> Our last meeting was cancelled at the last minute due to a lack of items
> to discuss, and there has been no updates on any of the drafts and no
> discussion on-list since IETF88 (and only limited discussion prior to
> that), so I haven’t been in a hurry to request one for London.
>
> At least one of the WG drafts expires soon, and all of the individual
> drafts that have *-sunset4-* in their name are expiring. We are still
> awaiting a revised draft on NAT64 port allocation that integrates the
> different drafts into one so that it can be discussed, I do not know
> what the status of the other individual drafts are.
>
> We need to see some activity, and your co-chairs could use some guidance
> on whether or not we should request a timeslot, and if so, how long? I’m
> inclined to request an hour so that we have a meeting if we need it, but
> I don’t want to burn timeslots unnecessarily because scheduling is
> already enough of a hassle.

draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis will get a minor update before it expires 
(in two days).

As for draft-ietf-sunset4-noipv4, I don't have anything on my to-do list 
for a new revision. So it would expire in two days unless I submit a 
no-changes update.

IMHO, a good way to get feedback is WGLC.

Right now there would not be much to discuss about those two drafts in 
London.

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca