[sunset4] Are we done with "no IPv4"?
Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Mon, 14 April 2014 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239F11A03E7 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.173
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.173 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kmNOJcW7m0pa for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144C51A044B for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 07:45:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:2520:ef8a:477:622f]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FC50403FF for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:44:57 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <534BF469.7060509@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:44:57 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sunset4/H0sumBQOPZPouarKaPqEGk1SVq4
Subject: [sunset4] Are we done with "no IPv4"?
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sunset4/>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 14:45:04 -0000
WG, About this: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sunset4-noipv4-00 It's been a long time since we touched that draft. Are we done with it? Are there issues left? I don't have anything on my list. If anyone on this list could re-read the document in full and let us know of any issues, it would be of tremendous help. Thanks, Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
- [sunset4] Are we done with "no IPv4"? Simon Perreault