IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sunset4] "determine if CGN is a suitable sunsetting technology"

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 02 May 2012 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E686C21F85AF for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.162
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.162 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j8ih4jq2rrg8 for <sunset4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 May 2012 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4411B21F84F3 for <sunset4@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 May 2012 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BB520CC3; Wed, 2 May 2012 16:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E3Pcu2GQNTmu; Wed, 2 May 2012 16:08:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A727020CA9; Wed, 2 May 2012 16:08:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id B58311EC7AAC; Wed, 2 May 2012 16:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 16:08:12 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
Message-ID: <20120502140812.GA4783@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Sunset IPv4 <sunset4@ietf.org>
References: <4FA105C3.2050403@gmail.com> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD465693779173F7BF0BC@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD465693779173F7BF0BC@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Sunset IPv4 <sunset4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sunset4] "determine if CGN is a suitable sunsetting technology"
X-BeenThere: sunset4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: sunset4 working group discussion list <sunset4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sunset4>
List-Post: <mailto:sunset4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4>, <mailto:sunset4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 14:08:14 -0000

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:54:39AM -0400, George, Wes wrote:

> > However, this doesn't demonstrate a gap to be filled by new IPv4
> > work in this WG - it tends to show that for carriers, no new
> > standards work is needed (if they choose to go the CGN route).

> [WEG] The two don't have to be joined in every case. I think that
> CGN is probably one of those where those two items are not related
> because protocol work is unnecessary.

I like to point out that there are no standard MIBs for monitoring
boxes such as CGN. The MIB modules we have lack features. See for
example here:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schoenw-behave-nat-mib-bis-00
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-perreault-opsawg-natmib-bis-00
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-00

The last one is mentioned in the sunset4 charter, not sure whether
this means the intention is to move this document from behave to
sunset4. Perhaps the intention was just to be undefined. ;-)

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email