[Supa] review for draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-02

Yangyang Wang <wyystar@gmail.com> Sun, 09 July 2017 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wyystar@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0050128961 for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 02:58:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_NONELEMENT_30_40=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o_HT-hXhGdaT for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 02:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22d.google.com (mail-oi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20B8C1276AF for <supa@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 02:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id p188so55637682oia.0 for <supa@ietf.org>; Sun, 09 Jul 2017 02:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aL0AmnnjJGaIuhJzTD5q3Yvl23eS5uXXkfuPhiw9duc=; b=i5/3b1q2ySF0W9S4cSmFuov/BZ68q1to94VeocfGzRgSkPW6FerW+plUmc/zYT4Ew/ BCnwN6WTE3MWFGXCaHmo2mEewgFe/3iGD5PEEiBtU5SpYlffgomFXgj201zVhmpZGBmT Ocp0nynVecKduPkGW5o4UnpMH4gurxdHM8uQvZkdKNgJ3jdolPEl6Q6nQcNLsIf/JnsU Xr+atA+xZp8ic5nsoy0pQNBvlPCGElyIZ3Rxif9K+FvBvGSOxzqBNGVjP2Q2YqrGSHlI SfFa29qlulVE9UbZlJYTLD2IK6PO77hT4lxZurmEqUNfP3PF6AAd1ZgwDxtDxFMs6TCG ma9Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aL0AmnnjJGaIuhJzTD5q3Yvl23eS5uXXkfuPhiw9duc=; b=eA+liWB4FgZH5T5ue/+A7m9TCM0LqUMWhjnXIQ781YCq1jAlgo+cr9IF59QRNAp/5H J9Nv1bpSd2ol23PYHcy6PEjPtLD5Tr9NOY3GQorQGYdPbQAFcwyT19XzaMaGkbcKNrev gmaVfxR4qcfEhi/1ekyYnwvc7HRqbkgLFKkZL+pQ4TAz/8MRPnfIAGY/97K4jO2sxhHw 4wT10ziJ5QrEeATeOg25KgS8v6fmjO3+ilT9N5QjxqkYLUq1Nm8NlH7bG8UFKJkWSVak pWW7OAOaDEZSWxJsw+VrFyf+JvXHSPNFU5iPn8JMa8Vt7+yhxCEwWVBTzRQKQ/n/EBSb /yiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111oETXtPCNd3ilKP1xn3EuUKU38wTMU5ZG9YOFylbxVpEE6gMsC y7AJoeC80nQAmY5R0/oilZvQqazQ2DPq
X-Received: by 10.202.1.209 with SMTP id 200mr6085599oib.110.1499594325390; Sun, 09 Jul 2017 02:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.74.161.19 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Jul 2017 02:58:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yangyang Wang <wyystar@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2017 17:58:44 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJ4hSFPkss-KBCK5TpmofbdpZoq1sWBE1XnMngfHJV-Gm+Gq7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: supa@ietf.org
Cc: liushucheng@huawei.com, Jun Bi <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1137be78127b030553df83b6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/Pt1eomMYhXQMiEm2qiLoqsfAGJs>
Subject: [Supa] review for draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework-02
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2017 09:58:48 -0000

I have reviewed  draft-ietf-supa-policy-based-management-framework. My
comments are as follows:

1) This draft contains many concepts that are very abstract. I suggest this
draft may briefly describe the contents and the goal  of this draft and its
significance. Some simple and concrete instances can be added in the
descriptions of the management framework to help clarify the abstract
concepts and framework in this draft.

2) "Traffic flow over increasingly complex enterprise and service provider
network becomes more and more important" may be change to "The management
of Traffic flow over increasingly complex enterprise and service provider
network becomes more and more important ?

3) "OSS:Operations/Operational Support System, are computer systems" should
be "OSS: Operations/Operational Support Systems, are computer systems".

4) "Imperative policy rules require additional management functions, which
are explained in section 2.2 below" may be  "Imperative policy rules
require additional management functions, which are explained in section 3.2
below"

5) "(1:1..n) in (1) and (2) below figure 3 shows one policy rule is able to
manages and can adjust one or multiple services/resources." may be
"(1:1..n) in (1) and (2) below figure 3 show one policy rule is able to
manage and adjust one or multiple services/resources." ?

6) "The Operator actor shown can interact with SUPA in other ways not shown
in Figure 1" may be "The Operator actor, shown in figure 1, can interact
with SUPA in other ways not shown in Figure 1"




Best regards,
Yangyang