[Supa] my review of draft-liu-supa-policy-based-management-framework-01
"Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bwietf@bwijnen.net> Tue, 19 July 2016 15:23 UTC
Return-Path: <bwietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Original-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: supa@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2326F12DD2B for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wE-pFzPbDf86 for <supa@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb2-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A867712E18E for <supa@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-b0ea.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.176.234]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id Lf4G1t00353osVK01f4KlS; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:04:20 +0200
References: <05b060e7-1c91-d624-93e4-6828fe22b0f4@bwijnen.net>
To: "supa@ietf.org" <supa@ietf.org>
From: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bwietf@bwijnen.net>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <05b060e7-1c91-d624-93e4-6828fe22b0f4@bwijnen.net>
Message-ID: <ddfecac7-c07f-3fd7-516f-21bb4f831a71@bwijnen.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 17:04:16 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <05b060e7-1c91-d624-93e4-6828fe22b0f4@bwijnen.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/supa/qNvYuwEuYYqG3xf9dS5hLLgpw2A>
Subject: [Supa] my review of draft-liu-supa-policy-based-management-framework-01
X-BeenThere: supa@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is to discuss SUPA \(Simplified Use of Policy Abstractions\) related issues." <supa.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/supa/>
List-Post: <mailto:supa@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/supa>, <mailto:supa-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:23:47 -0000
Hi, I reviewed this document, and I think it is basically fine as a starting point for the WG to indeed produce and architecture/framework document. I think (Tianran, but he can speak for himself and) I can withdraw our architecture document in favor of this one (our draft already expired, so it is sort of automatically disappearing). I do have a few comments about the framework document: - I still find the IM work unneeded and extra work, while the WG intent is to just define data models based on YANG. That is my opinion. I understand (do not agree, but accept WG consensus) that the WG has deided thatthey do want to do IM work. - maybe the framework should/could at least list/show how declarative policy (although not a current WG chartered work item) fits in. I guess that could also be done at a later point in time when we are ready to indeed work on declarative. Bert
- [Supa] my review of draft-liu-supa-policy-based-m… Bert Wijnen (IETF)