IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Syslog] Issue 6 - Reference 2

Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com> Wed, 09 June 2010 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <clonvick@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: syslog@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: syslog@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF183A688F for <syslog@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:07:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.405, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7sWxWNX2134S for <syslog@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CC23A685B for <syslog@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 19:07:16 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAG+TDkyrRN+K/2dsb2JhbACeRHGlUZl8hRYEg0c
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,387,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="141377932"
Received: from sj-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.223.138]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jun 2010 02:07:17 +0000
Received: from sjc-cde-011.cisco.com (sjc-cde-011.cisco.com [171.69.16.68]) by sj-core-4.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o5927H2P024335; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 02:07:17 GMT
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:07:17 -0700
From: Chris Lonvick <clonvick@cisco.com>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C0EAC2C.5050105@ieca.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1006081906340.17237@sjc-cde-011.cisco.com>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.63.1006070757030.27400@sjc-cde-011.cisco.com> <01d601cb06e9$02b5b300$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <4C0EAC2C.5050105@ieca.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: syslog@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Syslog] Issue 6 - Reference 2
X-BeenThere: syslog@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Issues in Network Event Logging <syslog.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog>
List-Post: <mailto:syslog@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog>, <mailto:syslog-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 02:07:17 -0000

Hi,

Joe has the token for Editor role.  Yup; let's just make this change and 
make it DONE.  :-)

Thanks,
Chris

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Sean Turner wrote:

> I think that's what he's asking for too.
>
> spt
>
> t.petch wrote:
>>  Presumably this is s5.4.1 where we lack the [ ] that are present in all
>>  other
>>  references to RFC5425.
>>
>>  Tom Petch
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: "Chris Lonvick" <clonvick@cisco.com>
>>  To: <syslog@ietf.org>
>>  Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 5:19 PM
>>  Subject: [Syslog] Issue 6 - Reference 2
>>
>> 
>> >  Issue 6 - Reference 2
>> > 
>> >  From Miguel Garcia (GENART review)
>> > 
>> >  - Section 5.4.1: It would be nice to add a formal reference to RFC 5425
>> >  when it is mentioned.
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  ACTION:  Authors to review and incorporate a change if needed.
>> > 
>> >  _______________________________________________
>> >  Syslog mailing list
>> >  Syslog@ietf.org
>> >  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Syslog mailing list
>>  Syslog@ietf.org
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email