[T2TRG] Re: IRSG review of draft-irtf-t2trg-taxonomy-manufacturer-anchors-18

[Dirk Kutscher <[e-mail]>]

OK, thanks, Alexey!

Best regards,
Dirk

On 17 Aug 2026, at 23:27, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> -20 looks fine to me. I think the document should progress to full 
> IRSG review.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Alexey
>
> On 25/06/2026 18:46, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Thank you for for the comments.
>>
>> Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>      > I have a few small nits to report/questions to ask:
>>
>>      > While the document contains a sentence that this document is a 
>> product of T2TRG, I believe it also requires to contain the following 
>> somewhere in the document (This might be a boilerplate flag in the 
>> document):
>>
>>      > This document is a product of the Internet Research
>>      > Task Force (IRTF).  The IRTF publishes the results of 
>> Internet-
>>      > related research and development activities.  These results 
>> might
>>      > not be suitable for deployment.
>>
>> I have added this before the Introduction in the markdown... however, 
>> I think
>> it lives in the boilerplate and the RPC would do this?
>>
>>      > I got 404 accessing this URL:
>>
>>      > [keyceremony2]
>>      > Digi-Sign, "SAS 70 Key Ceremony", 4 April 2020,
>>      > <http://www.digi-sign.com/compliance/key%20ceremony/
>>      index> .
>>
>> Me too, and a certificate error (revoked certificate) trying to get 
>> to the
>> HTTPS.  I looked around for SAS 70 references, and one winds up with 
>> SSAE 18,
>> and while I'm sure that's applicable, it's not very Key Ceremony 
>> specific.
>>
>> I propose to replace it with: 
>> "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_ceremony"
>>
>>      > Is there a better reference?
>>
>>      > The document also contains a fair number of references to 
>> drafts which
>>      > are expired and without much sign of life. While it is not a 
>> problem in
>>      > itself, it might be worth reviewing whether various references 
>> are
>>      > still useful to keep in this document.
>>
>> I will review that list today.
>> In the meantime, I'm posting -19.
>>
>> {bib.ietf.org has not been behaving today...  my 26.8 day cache ought 
>> to be fine...}
>>
>> --
>> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT 
>> consulting )
>>             Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>>
>> **       My working hours and your working hours may be different.    
>>      **
>> ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working 
>> hours **