Re: [T2TRG] πŸ”” RG adoption of draft-keranen-t2trg-rest-iot

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 30 October 2017 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: t2trg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD9A1386A2; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 06:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWbgwUCFdrhZ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 06:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 917E213F9E1; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 06:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v9UDkP17017094; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:46:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.119] (p5DC7FC78.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.252.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3yQbNx4wDDzDXvZ; Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:46:25 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <F962E25B-703F-49FB-BC0B-0E5C93A4FAEB@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 14:46:24 +0100
Cc: t2trg-chairs@irtf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 531063984.771404-a592186dc3601d74bd30ba25b131c5fb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <24193675-5241-4136-8A8F-80A6E567B10D@tzi.org>
References: <F962E25B-703F-49FB-BC0B-0E5C93A4FAEB@tzi.org>
To: t2trg@irtf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/t2trg/KvEVXsbm5L-Fr2Zfa7XDKuqO3Ac>
Subject: Re: [T2TRG] πŸ”” RG adoption of draft-keranen-t2trg-rest-iot
X-BeenThere: t2trg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Thing-to-Thing Research Group <t2trg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/t2trg/>
List-Post: <mailto:t2trg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg>, <mailto:t2trg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:46:37 -0000

On Sep 29, 2017, at 23:04, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> In Berlin, we had another session about draft-keranen-t2trg-rest-iot.
> 
> I think it is about time that we treat this document as an RG document.
> 
> Do the members of this RG agree?
> 
> We should adopt this document if we think that, after some further work, we could publish it as an RG publication β€” and we have the energy to do that work.
> 
> Please send your opinion on the first point (and may be volunteer to contribute a review to the second point) to the list (or, exceptionally, to the chairs, in CC) before close of business Monday 2017-10-09.

We had a few affirmative replies on this, with no negative replies.

I trust that the affirmative replies came from people that also are willing to provide reviews of the document.

So I think we have reached enough support to continue to work on this as an RG draft.

Authors: please submit the next version as draft-irtf-t2trg-rest-iot.

Grüße, Carsten