Re: [T2TRG] draft-irtf-t2trg-iot-seccons-07

[Hannes Tschofenig <[e-mail]>]

Sounds good. I would keep it focused on protocols.

On 10/12/2017 04:26 PM, Ari Keränen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I had a fresh look at the draft thinking how we could address the issue of being more clear on the intent(s) of the document. Perhaps we could add to the abstract and/or intro something along the lines of:
> 
> "This document can be used by IoT standards specifications as a reference for details about security considerations applying to the specified system or protocol."
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Ari
> 
>> On 11 Oct 2017, at 17.58, Mohit Sethi M <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hannes,
>>
>> Thanks for volunteering to shepherd the document. I think your feedback will definitely help the us (the authors) to improve the document quality.
>>
>> I think Ari has very succinctly pointed out the motivation for this draft. Of course, if you think that there is some text that would better highlight the motivation, we are happy to add/modify.
>>
>> Please also bear in mind that this is a informational research group document so it talks about several security challenges, protocols, tools and building blocks.
>>
>> --Mohit
>> On 10/10/2017 02:19 PM, Ari Keränen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> For context on this discussion, as I said in the other thread:
>>>
>>>> This draft started as a "IoT security considerations" document that would allow people writing security considerations for (IETF) IoT drafts to point to more detailed discussion on what are the threats and potential remedies in the envisioned IoT systems. And it still serves that purpose.
>>>>
>>>> In addition the draft summarises the existing work in this space. Hence is turned out to be (also) "SotA and Challenges" draft.
>>> And that's how I read the current text. But yes, let's make sure we are aligned here and the intention is clear for everyone.
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ari
>>>
>>>> On 10 Oct 2017, at 12.40, Hannes Tschofenig <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> as I volunteered to help shepherd the draft I want to do a good job in
>>>> reviewing the work.
>>>>
>>>> It would be good for the authors (and the group) to clearly articulate
>>>> what the main purpose of the draft is. Ari mentioned that the purpose
>>>> was to write a "document that would allow people writing security
>>>> considerations for (IETF) IoT drafts". This is not what the document
>>>> currently says.
>>>>
>>>> Either Ari is wrong about the intended purpose or the text needs to be
>>>> corrected.
>>>>
>>>> Before I provide detailed review comments I prefer to know what it aims
>>>> to accomplish.
>>>>
>>>> Ciao
>>>> Hannes
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> T2TRG mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> T2TRG mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> T2TRG mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg
>