Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM

[Xiangsong Cui <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the information!

Regards,
Xiangsong

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 5:24 PM
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM
> 
> For HTTP over SCTP see discussion in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wood-tae-specifying-uri-transports
> and particularly
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-natarajan-http-over-sctp
> 
> This can form part of making HTTP run over more streaming protocols, not
just
> TCP, to adapt it for different/high performane environments:
>
http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/publications/internet-drafts
/
>
draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery/lloyd-wood-turning-http-into-a-standalone
-l
> ayer-ietf-75-tsvarea-slides.pdf
> talk given to the TSVAREA meeting, IETF 75, Stockholm, 27 July 2009.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Xiangsong Cui
> Sent: 29 November 2010 02:34
> To: 'Ali C. Begen (abegen)'; 'Scheffenegger, Richard'; 'Mike Belshe';
> [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM
> 
> > Sure but HTTP is not using SCTP today. Should we look into it?
> 
> Sorry for digging this topic in tcpm list, but I think the guys interested
in this
> topic also cover tcpm.
> 
> I think this is an interesting item.
> 
> In my remember, a Bar-BoF (or BoF) named "Negotiation BoF" was ever
> mentioned at IETF76 (denied by AD at that time).
> 
> There is a draft, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-http-new-tech-00,
> and Dan presented this topic at IETF79,
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/tsvwg-9.pptx,
> 
> Who can tell me more information about this? I missed the BoF at IETF76.
> 
> Thanks and regards,
> Xiangsong
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tae mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae