IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM

<L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk> Mon, 29 November 2010 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tae@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183323A6C04; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:23:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uoczQPtFkc+h; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail82.messagelabs.com (mail82.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.67]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736F43A6BFD; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 01:23:09 -0800 (PST)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-82.messagelabs.com!1291022657!27893339!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [131.227.200.39]
Received: (qmail 30044 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 09:24:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO EXHT012P.surrey.ac.uk) (131.227.200.39) by server-15.tower-82.messagelabs.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 09:24:18 -0000
Received: from EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk ([169.254.1.245]) by EXHT012P.surrey.ac.uk ([131.227.200.39]) with mapi; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:24:17 +0000
From: L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk
To: Xiangsong.Cui@huawei.com, abegen@cisco.com, rs@netapp.com, mike@belshe.com, tcpm@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:24:14 +0000
Thread-Topic: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM
Thread-Index: AcuNlUG/mOB0699nQE6fHFKA+8QeOgA3CztAAB9I3tAAAwxuUAAcQVdwAA6z90A=
Message-ID: <FD7B10366AE3794AB1EC5DE97A93A37316BF449412@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk>
References: <AANLkTikrYDgAjb9yKvcc_hS12OHeydtL8uXL=qWLg1Av@mail.gmail.com> <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540DBBAB26@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com> <5FDC413D5FA246468C200652D63E627A0BA9624C@LDCMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <04CAD96D4C5A3D48B1919248A8FE0D540DC92F71@xmb-sjc-215.amer.cisco.com> <003801cb8f6d$d351ed00$79f5c700$%cui@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <003801cb8f6d$d351ed00$79f5c700$%cui@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, en-GB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: tae@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM
X-BeenThere: tae@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Architecture Evolution <tae.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tae>
List-Post: <mailto:tae@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae>, <mailto:tae-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:23:13 -0000

For HTTP over SCTP see discussion in 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wood-tae-specifying-uri-transports
and particularly
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-natarajan-http-over-sctp

This can form part of making HTTP run over more streaming protocols, not just TCP, to adapt it for different/high performane environments:
http://personal.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/publications/internet-drafts/draft-wood-dtnrg-http-dtn-delivery/lloyd-wood-turning-http-into-a-standalone-layer-ietf-75-tsvarea-slides.pdf
talk given to the TSVAREA meeting, IETF 75, Stockholm, 27 July 2009.

-----Original Message-----
From: tae-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tae-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Xiangsong Cui
Sent: 29 November 2010 02:34
To: 'Ali C. Begen (abegen)'; 'Scheffenegger, Richard'; 'Mike Belshe'; tcpm@ietf.org
Cc: tae@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tae] [tcpm] A Challenge to TCPM

> Sure but HTTP is not using SCTP today. Should we look into it?

Sorry for digging this topic in tcpm list, but I think the guys interested in this topic also cover tcpm.

I think this is an interesting item.

In my remember, a Bar-BoF (or BoF) named "Negotiation BoF" was ever mentioned at IETF76 (denied by AD at that time).

There is a draft, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-http-new-tech-00,
and Dan presented this topic at IETF79,
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/tsvwg-9.pptx,

Who can tell me more information about this? I missed the BoF at IETF76.

Thanks and regards,
Xiangsong


_______________________________________________
tae mailing list
tae@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tae

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email