Re: [ledbat] Note well on the BitTorrent problem on the example...

"Robb Topolski" <robb@funchords.com> Thu, 20 November 2008 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ledbat-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tana-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tana-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B913A6A37; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ledbat@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ledbat@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70B73A6A37 for <ledbat@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.091, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BThRO-lGK+PE for <ledbat@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.232]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3473A6939 for <ledbat@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so599135rvf.49 for <ledbat@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.141.137.3 with SMTP id p3mr1416434rvn.296.1227213226024; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.141.69.3 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3efc39a60811201233n62b4265ar566228d4e4f60d12@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:33:45 -0800
From: Robb Topolski <robb@funchords.com>
To: ledbat@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <27294E60-8183-47F5-9672-D712E4D85493@icsi.berkeley.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <27294E60-8183-47F5-9672-D712E4D85493@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: [ledbat] Note well on the BitTorrent problem on the example...
X-BeenThere: ledbat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of the LEDBAT WG <ledbat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ledbat>
List-Post: <mailto:ledbat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat>, <mailto:ledbat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0564434152=="
Sender: ledbat-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ledbat-bounces@ietf.org

Can you say more about this?

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@icsi.berkeley.edu
> wrote:

> A network with only 128 Kbps uplink, >1.5 Mbps downlink (a 10-1
> download/upload ratio) is not suitable for P2P anyway, it really should be
> "leech only", as it contributes nothing to the P2P system in practice.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ledbat mailing list
> ledbat@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat
>



-- 
Robb Topolski (robb@funchords.com)
Hillsboro, Oregon USA
http://www.funchords.com/
_______________________________________________
ledbat mailing list
ledbat@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat