IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tao-discuss] Last round of revisions for this version + doc management

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 15 June 2018 17:21 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344EF12F18C for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lwwGRee6p78C for <tao-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 446C0124D68 for <tao-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.73] (50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5FHKxcs025659 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:21:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-141.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.141] claimed to be [10.32.60.73]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.eti.br>
Cc: tao-discuss@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 10:20:59 -0700
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.11.2r5479)
Message-ID: <447E280D-5E5E-4331-9EFC-8EE23D9CB508@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <199c8400-cd42-500a-aecc-641365c48485@braga.eti.br>
References: <ff21b3e9-212d-abb3-a50c-bb8f0b90211d@nielstenoever.net> <7CD278D6-8135-4CC2-B393-79C482D28AD0@vpnc.org> <199c8400-cd42-500a-aecc-641365c48485@braga.eti.br>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tao-discuss/T-uSVETZfH-f3SI38j8PQfmpsXw>
Subject: Re: [tao-discuss] Last round of revisions for this version + doc management
X-BeenThere: tao-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the Tao of the IETF <tao-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tao-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tao-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tao-discuss>, <mailto:tao-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 17:21:05 -0000

On 15 Jun 2018, at 10:15, Juliao Braga wrote:

> Spanish and Portuguese translations have been used intensively and 
> have served very well for the dissemination of the IETF / IRTF in 
> Latin America and Portuguese-speaking countries in Africa and Europe. 
> I'm not sure, but it seems to me that the Spanish translation has been 
> used in Spanish-speaking countries outside Latin America.

Great, this is good to hear! I had heard from a bunch of Chinese 
speakers about the Chinese translation, but not from others. I'm glad 
the translation effort is worth it.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email