[Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)

TAPS WG status robot <tapsbot@magpie.corvid.ch> Fri, 09 July 2021 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tapsbot@magpie.corvid.ch>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7B23A1779 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 01:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TczzahnyqMLv for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 01:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from magpie.corvid.ch (magpie.corvid.ch [46.101.110.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E20B3A1770 for <taps@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 01:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=magpie.corvid.ch) by magpie.corvid.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <tapsbot@magpie.corvid.ch>) id 1m1lQc-0002yU-5G for taps@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:00:06 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1831591306248329117=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: TAPS WG status robot <tapsbot@magpie.corvid.ch>
To: taps@ietf.org
Message-Id: <E1m1lQc-0002yU-5G@magpie.corvid.ch>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:00:06 +0000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/3rcZXvsg4ZilZYabws15uto3-NI>
Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:02:29 -0000



Issues
------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+0/-25/💬20)
  13 issues received 20 new comments:
  - #852 Using Multicast Endpoints (7 by mwelzl, gorryfair, GrumpyOldTroll)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/852 [API] 
  - #865 Should Endpoint Object identifiers be discoverable? (2 by mwelzl, dhobsd)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/865 [API] 
  - #864 Are scoped IPv6 address (and zone indexes in particular) supported? (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/864 [API] 
  - #800 Remove use of the word TAPS? (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/800 [API] [editorial] 
  - #802 S3.2: Reference to single namespace is unclear (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/802 [API] [editorial] 
  - #811 S4.2.11. Interface Instance or Type - text clarification needed (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/811 [API] [editorial] 
  - #843 Where are events sent? (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/843 [API] [editorial] 
  - #815 S7.3.2.1. - send replies and map responses to their requests (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/815 [API] 
  - #753 Nit: Section 3.1: No such protocol… (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/753 [Implementation] [editorial] 
  - #819 EstablishementError or InitiateError? Both names are used. (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/819 [API] [editorial] 
  - #791 be more concrete about receiving (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/791 [API] 
  - #672 Perform a final edit pass on all three docs: normalize capitalization/spelling of keywords, formatting, pseudocode syntax, etc. (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/672 [API] [Architecture] [Implementation] [editorial] [ready for text] 
  - #798 S1.1: Definition of Tuple refers to property before it is defined (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/798 [API] [editorial] 

  25 issues closed:
  - S3.1.3 Wrong event handler in code exampe https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/801 [API] [editorial] 
  - unified interface to datagram and connection-oriented transports https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/846 [API] [editorial] 
  - Nit: Section 3.1: No such protocol… https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/753 [Implementation] [editorial] 
  - argh unbreak circleci again https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/738 
  - API summary does more than summarise https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/849 [API] [editorial] 
  - Scope of the Interface Definition https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/851 [API] [editorial] 
  - Endpoint aliases and protocols https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/854 [API] [editorial] 
  - Where are events sent? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/843 [API] [editorial] 
  - Can we give the tables names in Appendix B? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/850 [API] [editorial] 
  - EstablishementError or InitiateError? Both names are used. https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/819 [API] [editorial] 
  - Convenience Functions - options rather than requirements https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/820 [API] [editorial] 
  - S7.1.3.3. Ordered - Default seems to point to wrong Selection Property https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/814 [API] [editorial] 
  - S7.3.3.1. UDP(-Lite)-specific Property: ECN - Motivation https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/817 [API] [editorial] 
  - S4.2.3. What makes Configure Per-Message Reliability special? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/807 [API] [editorial] 
  - S7.3.2.2. ReceivedPartial Example https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/816 [API] [editorial] 
  -  6. Managing Connections - overlapping bullets https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/813 [API] [editorial] 
  - S4.2.11. Interface Instance or Type - text clarification needed https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/811 [API] [editorial] 
  - S4.2 Use of recommended  https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/805 [API] [editorial] 
  - S3.2.2: Enumeration is a basic type so the two bullets do not read correctly https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/803 [API] [editorial] 
  - S3.2: Reference to single namespace is unclear https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/802 [API] [editorial] 
  - S2. Very long bullets are hard to read https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/799 [API] [editorial] 
  - S1.1: Definition of Tuple refers to property before it is defined https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/798 [API] [editorial] 
  - When are objects frozen? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/859 [API] [Implementation] 
  - S4.2.14. Multipath Transport - why different? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/812 [API] 
  - Remove use of the word TAPS? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/800 [API] [editorial] 



Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+6/-9/💬4)
  6 pull requests submitted:
  - Resolve #872: text disclaiming multicast rendezvous (by GrumpyOldTroll)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/871 
  - editorial rollup number three (by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/870 
  - section refactor (by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/869 
  - More editorial fixes. (by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/868 
  - Many editorial fixes (rollup 1) (by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/867 
  - Preconnections are just structs (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/866 [API] 

  3 pull requests received 4 new comments:
  - #862 Help UDP fit wrt connection (2 by gorryfair, csperkins)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/862 [Architecture] 
  - #869 section refactor (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/869 
  - #863 Re-group managing  properties & protocol instances (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/863 [API] [editorial] 

  9 pull requests merged:
  - editorial rollup number three
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/870 
  - section refactor
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/869 
  - Editorial nits
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/856 [API] [editorial] 
  - More editorial fixes.
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/868 
  - Many editorial fixes (rollup 1)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/867 
  - Preconnections are just structs
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/866 [API] 
  - Fixes #812
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/857 [API] 
  - Help UDP fit wrt connection
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/862 [Architecture] 
  - Re-group managing  properties & protocol instances
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/863 [API] [editorial] 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts