IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] finishing things

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Sun, 17 November 2019 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C95120837 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:40:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id df2RoAkwguMi for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC219120838 for <taps@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 19:39:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx03.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1iWBPn-0006HJ-4O; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:39:55 +0100
Received: from [103.24.106.34] (helo=[192.167.2.106]) by mail-mx03.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1iWBPk-000Fpi-Li; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 04:39:55 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-C4F73ACE-7ED7-49DE-8908-159BAE3F2D53"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 11:39:48 +0800
Message-Id: <7655533F-77AD-4DEF-AA5A-3FA3367D2C64@ifi.uio.no>
References: <24E6F5C5-ABF2-40F6-A6CB-A33EB4D4A42C@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, taps@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <24E6F5C5-ABF2-40F6-A6CB-A33EB4D4A42C@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A878)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx03.uio.no: 103.24.106.34 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=103.24.106.34; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=[192.167.2.106];
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 86C4F1DDEE33B5E2508DA2A97E28235E593A596E
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/4XiFXQc7lDIsA5Ht4C4cyY2tyuk>
Subject: Re: [Taps] finishing things
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 03:40:01 -0000

but many issues already have people assigned in github....   just a matter of making sure all are assigned to someone?  that should be easy


Sent from my iPhone

> On 17 Nov 2019, at 10:39, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Excellent point. Suppose at a minimum we assign an owner to each issue to propose and socialize a resolution? If it’s already known or obvious, can the folks preparing for Tuesday’s meeting put names of nominal owners by issues?
> 
> On 16 Nov 2019, at 22:37, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote:
> 
> +1; we should allocate time on our agenda here to actually set the schedule for these interims, to avoid the ”let’s think about that later” problem.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 16 Nov 2019, at 15:13, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
>> 
>> I think this is a great idea.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 16, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey Working Group,
>>> 
>>> Before we meet on Tuesday I wanted to put an idea on the table that I think will shape our wg discussion. What do you think of setting a goal of WGLC for our three in-progress docs before the March IETF? This would require increasing wg activity, for example, having monthly calls to consider and resolve open issues. I think we’re reaching a point where wg engagement is starting to drop and I’m concerned if we delay closing out the docs there will be few people engaged to do a serious review of the results. A lot of work has gone into TAPS and I think we should aspire to finish strong. Comments? I’m especially interested to hear what the doc editors think.
>>> 
>>> --aaron
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Taps mailing list
>>> Taps@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taps mailing list
>> Taps@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email