[Taps] adopting draft-welzl-taps-transports

Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Wed, 28 October 2015 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DB51A8937 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vMKguJBgCsI for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x236.google.com (mail-yk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8E81A8904 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykba4 with SMTP id a4so8652415ykb.3 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6FVC7CdWuUKDGaMskDP0d64JWATedgBqYxoeO6pDDHg=; b=iH1JqTDIJptWrhdnD/zORozcJ1/E5Zp6eqfy4rTBEpy1xF0xmXDZ9Y/1s4PaIjd9t2 dyYQRcepmLfELted/Iu+LK3xOSQep3EczUUc10vgFgs6eR6o0WpJblwrseKTDWMkVm3D sILESq1sHugiUTnRNqRzjSekLiuZ9xyWer2Sy8EjLBo3n5mOW8bJQxzLiq+/E3xWh1BV bN9oiqt5ijrNU+EMby73aNMEfQ1V9n4mgmXaA53m4JXfAvTI/y2lVVBFYNeVNVAMDC5L SQ1g33cUojQdUJ2G3/VYt51sbTmYbGgPQaXiHHgTRSY0unfjwgpFnzHTSLbW9rQGW2IN v5Hw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.13.201.68 with SMTP id l65mr34668029ywd.340.1446041433537; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.95.2 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Oct 2015 07:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:10:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD62q9V5w+cwE_SS3KAAmj-CFzWCYux9TirjEgcFHYc17Pfo6w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e870afa1e9d05232ac16e
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/JOpp9pr-pNCCjctOowKIafSp1lI>
Cc: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, Naeem Khademi <naeemk@ifi.uio.no>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: [Taps] adopting draft-welzl-taps-transports
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 14:10:36 -0000

I've not heard any objections to work on this document and several
proposals for why it would help docs 2 & 3 (as well as the implementations
based on 3).

1. Should TAPS adopt draft-welzl-taps-transports as a working group
deliverable?

2. To some folks it sounds as though this doc is a pre-requisite to doc 2.
Do folks agree?  Can we start on doc 2 in parallel or should we wait?

--aaron