[Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)
TAPS WG status robot <tapsbot@magpie.corvid.ch> Fri, 25 October 2019 08:02 UTC
Return-Path: <tapsbot@magpie.corvid.ch>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D9512012D for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QvtCy0Ikk7is for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from magpie.corvid.ch (magpie.corvid.ch [46.101.110.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDF3412012A for <taps@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=magpie.corvid.ch) by magpie.corvid.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <tapsbot@magpie.corvid.ch>) id 1iNuVx-0002N0-U7 for taps@ietf.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:00:05 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============7384721001378382791=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: TAPS WG status robot <tapsbot@magpie.corvid.ch>
To: taps@ietf.org
Message-Id: <E1iNuVx-0002N0-U7@magpie.corvid.ch>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:00:05 +0000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/KrOwgx56bTfNg6Gu7wf6bWk_gew>
Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity Digest)
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:02:20 -0000
Issues ------ * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+2/-5/💬6) 2 issues created: - Default values (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/357 [API] - Fix "Implementing maintenance" section (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/356 6 issues received 6 new comments: - #257 Not all Events are shown in the diagram (1 by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/257 [Architecture] - #145 Draft should point at implementations somewhere (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/145 [Implementation] [ready for text] - #309 Clarification on queued receives (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/309 [API] - #343 Listeners should have backpressure (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/343 [API] [ready for text] - #282 Implementation should describe how to handle proxies/TOR (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/282 [Implementation] [discuss] [help wanted] - #255 Editorial: Move Message Object to basic objects section (1 by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/255 [Architecture] [discuss] 5 issues closed: - Update implementation mapping text for SCTP https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/337 [Implementation] [ready for text] - The recommended default and can we specify rather than recommend? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/317 [API] [ready for text] - Listeners should have backpressure https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/343 [API] [ready for text] - Not all Events are shown in the diagram https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/257 [Architecture] - Editorial: Move Message Object to basic objects section https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/255 [Architecture] [discuss] Pull requests ------------- * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+4/-4/💬2) 4 pull requests submitted: - Architecture: Make overview section an actual overview (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/355 - Cleanup diagram to remove message, and add rendezvous (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/354 - Rename "Basic Objects" to "Connection Objects" to reduce confusion (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/353 - Implementation: mapping back to RFC 8303 (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/352 2 pull requests received 2 new comments: - #352 Implementation: mapping back to RFC 8303 (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/352 - #346 Fixes #313 per Gorry's comments (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/346 4 pull requests merged: - Implementation: mapping back to RFC 8303 https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/352 - Architecture: Make overview section an actual overview https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/355 - Cleanup diagram to remove message, and add rendezvous https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/354 - Rename "Basic Objects" to "Connection Objects" to reduce confusion https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/353 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts
- [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS GitHub Activity… TAPS WG status robot