[Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 22 October 2023 07:55 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FBFC1522CB for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 00:55:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.704
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="YUKiAyHj"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="H6yFTlD6"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IlhsHO4tQoog for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 00:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C612CC1519B1 for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 00:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4D85C0315 for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:40:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:40:15 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1697960415; x=1698046815; bh=N7e8juWi0NOLpHWj2r1xekMiT6sQ4oHqeF5 Da3fAqdw=; b=YUKiAyHjESnDuO767ckgMqcLP/yB99Aj5/CcL5qmXu0SKE37eNl /pXJPdNGqLzmMT9gk+JXRwrefLE/9Ocs8PoO0nG/GNl8vM+zo2evVAFXbSFhts20 x0MJLKqQWsqL8lvhqqimm2Ee72n/vz8E5F//O52dI5Z8pdJenhkbhpWE0ME5coBK Lwvi6FKO00Qhtxdd/xaaiyz2opO2Mm+Nz/rCbQ2t+QNJQ2AAsc+GaoE1J0u9wll+ mpgKypf9EQ3VhJmdOEXoFNw28ZdwFRLrT7VzejB6suuUt4oGLi8OhEpyqdXMe9Ba LyLVjCIjHmLhsROUMzr6fiy6W/cwoJ9sDbA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1697960415; x= 1698046815; bh=N7e8juWi0NOLpHWj2r1xekMiT6sQ4oHqeF5Da3fAqdw=; b=H 6yFTlD6UAhQEH6YWilPb8iFMGNwDJOiP+Sai060bwYKjevk/pTbZC5Qgzs3v6PI4 FkuQV3lOyruLGm2aS2yI9dtXn5vH/pzXI5vm3IE1O2f9H3omEPCVWc+vwMaviReU Kkh72bUg5N7cvk5cVbqRN6JvTNzL3sdUUnBE7RxYk6skv4x8qGNipyfWN98EldvD Voi/T7csk61/92BFEB9PPtieuN3TZGT1hEi3cykIMVj0G1TXdDIqbyGSuoitNmN0 u9/hmDfPJU9LNmdNkCt5IPv7Yiogi5mb8Q7cW5Mbv1lL/CxeOURaj2G/2xGyb8Ev aWwLWvMz8SXwRK2U0udTA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:39E0ZbYycJiYyIN2tOoPwDPB6Hbk-1s7UkNK6eVztAhy2GT6HGEMiw> <xme:39E0ZaY3E5HA3VaJy1S9jM_-ubGS94LHmu0dsNcb3t9uC5GtQyoY4ERHXnZOlYBH9 GHfha6oQpZ-g6Z_aw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:39E0Zd8tlkFRgw4Qq8zUv6Pz0KFrko76dXnLUUS0smvftwvCoS1T5VR8Z4J_eY8uqGV93KQkHBd2t5ZUa9Mzu5EZm3x7rrRI8Nszk21Rc8howkL099-AC2IJMTBm_-6_28vVbw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrkedvgdduiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmnecujf gurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucet tghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmh hnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfef hfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtoh hmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepvdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepugho pghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:39E0ZRpOn8oKNyczw88wnh4AhfW-TU_2xaLR9bhT_f06OuCWAElP-Q> <xmx:39E0ZWphOy7sVzqEe7bNDiuyX93Df1-cSQR9eo-jhV6oq56GII3Iwg> <xmx:39E0ZXRSbEOosTz47GP3xkwXNDrUKP-Uqc2q6fl2Arj1LgvDvvLFhw> <xmx:39E0ZUF5zDeQupWqyea-NrfIw9SIfX-5c2SRFbplg1mp1ZjLgM6y3g>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Oct 2023 03:40:15 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============5204689940052446249=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: taps@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20231022075548.C612CC1519B1@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 00:55:48 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/Ks-FVxcEPEjL_J_OGMO7Aaajxhk>
Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 07:55:53 -0000
Issues ------ * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+2/-35/💬25) 2 issues created: - Zero values for some properties are invalid or unspecified (by dhobsd) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1433 - What are implications of keepAlive and keepaliveTimeout on stacked protocols with keepalives? (by dhobsd) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1428 15 issues received 25 new comments: - #1428 What are implications of keepAlive and keepaliveTimeout on stacked protocols with keepalives? (2 by dhobsd, gorryfair) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1428 - #1377 Define words related to Connection states (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1377 [API] [From a partial review] - #1371 About using [] in the addRemote call (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1371 [API] [From a partial review] - #1366 About "ignoring events" (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1366 [API] [From a partial review] - #1358 Single credentials for multiple protocols? (1 by britram) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1358 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] - #1357 Netflows vs. IP flows (2 by mwelzl, tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1357 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] - #1345 0-RTT property name (2 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1345 [API] - #1343 Why didn't we overload WithIPAddress for multicast? (2 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1343 [API] - #1342 Service names should refer to IANA names; and "getservbyname" (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1342 [API] - #1328 Example on QUIC? (4 by abrunstrom, gorryfair, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1328 [wontfix] [Implementation] [From a partial review] - #1320 Why not QUIC? (2 by gorryfair, mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1320 [Architecture] - #1304 Ordering of connPriority and msgPriority (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1304 [API] - #1286 Clarify ambiguity in security properties (section 6.3 DISCUSS from Roman Danyliw) (2 by britram) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1286 [API] [review - must reply] - #1266 Section 6.1: WithIPAddress, WithInterface, WithPvD ? (1 by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1266 [API] - #1263 tcp in uppercase? (2 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1263 [wontfix] [API] [editorial] 35 issues closed: - Property names https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1338 [API] - Add local endpoint with ephemeral port to the example https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1374 [API] [From a partial review] - Wrong IP address in example https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1354 [API] - Preconnection vs Listener https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1363 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] - Netflows vs. IP flows https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1357 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] - Half-close clarification needed https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1234 [wontfix] [Architecture] - Section 6.1: WithIPAddress, WithInterface, WithPvD ? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1266 [wontfix] [API] - Application changing partial message while sending https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1282 [wontfix] [API] - MPTCP https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1299 [wontfix] [Architecture] - Example on QUIC? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1328 [wontfix] [Implementation] [From a partial review] - s/Ignore/None https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1310 [API] - Port integer type https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1341 [wontfix] [API] - Clarify rcv backpressure https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1352 [wontfix] [API] - PvD: RFC 8801 https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1305 [API] - 0-RTT property name https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1345 [API] - HTTPS = TCP/TLS ? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1344 [API] - String encoding shouldn't assume a defined string representation https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1337 [API] - How to express "Full Coverage" https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1346 [API] - WithPort and WithService, but not WithProtocol https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1361 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] - WithProtocol TCP/TLS in an example https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1333 [API] [review - must reply] - Usage of protocol identifiers https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1332 [API] [review - must reply] - Opportunistic => unauthenticated https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1376 [API] [From a partial review] - List of endpoint identifiers should contain types for all https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1373 [API] [From a partial review] - ALPN https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1362 [API] [review - must reply] [From a partial review] - Reference RFC 5952 https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1365 [API] [From a partial review] - Why not QUIC? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1320 [Architecture] - About "ignoring events" https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1366 [API] [From a partial review] - s/should not / SHOULD NOT https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1307 [API] - Ordering of connPriority and msgPriority https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1304 [API] - Complex interactions between properties https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1334 [API] [review - must reply] - Service names should refer to IANA names; and "getservbyname" https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1342 [API] - Bounds on send and receive rate https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1347 [API] - Make receive backpressure clearer https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1283 [API] - Why batch sends? https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1321 [Implementation] - Priority order https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1378 [API] [From a partial review] Pull requests ------------- * ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+11/-19/💬5) 11 pull requests submitted: - Update multicast example address (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1432 - Add ephemeral port example (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1431 [API] - Disambiguate security properties per rdd review (by britram) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1430 - Clarify that Listen creates a Listener from a Preconnection (by britram) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1429 - Clarify PvD identification (by tfpauly) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1427 [API] - Reference RFC 5952 (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1426 [API] - List of endpoint identifiers: types (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1425 [API] - Adjust mention of QUIC (by gorryfair) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1424 - String instances are represented in UTF-8 (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1423 [API] - Ignore => None (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1422 [API] - app SHOULD NOT assume that ignoring events is always safe (by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1421 [API] 5 pull requests received 5 new comments: - #1429 Clarify that Listen creates a Listener from a Preconnection (1 by TateGunning) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1429 - #1422 Ignore => None (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1422 [API] - #1420 "Initial Message will be Safely Replayable" instead of "0-RTT ..." (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1420 [API] - #1416 HTTPS can use TLS/TCP or QUIC, for example (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1416 [API] - #1404 Make Transport Property Names more strict (and case-insenstitive) (1 by mwelzl) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1404 [API] [discuss] 19 pull requests merged: - Make Transport Property Names more strict (and case-insenstitive) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1404 [API] [discuss] - Add ephemeral port example https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1431 [API] - Update multicast example address https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1432 - Clarify that Listen creates a Listener from a Preconnection https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1429 - Ignore => None https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1422 [API] - Clarify PvD identification https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1427 [API] - HTTPS can use TLS/TCP or QUIC, for example https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1416 [API] - String instances are represented in UTF-8 https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1423 [API] - Dealing with "if then" type clauses, try 2 (alternative to #1409) https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1410 [API] - Protocol identifiers are strings, listed in the API doc., and shouldn't normally be used https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1408 [API] - Opportunistic security is unauthenticated https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1412 - List of endpoint identifiers: types https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1425 [API] - Add ALPN parameter https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1399 [API] - Reference RFC 5952 https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1426 [API] - Adjust mention of QUIC https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1424 - app SHOULD NOT assume that ignoring events is always safe https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1421 [API] - Clarify rate bounds https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1406 [API] - Wording of receiver backpressure. https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1387 [API] - Rephrase batch sending https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1407 [Implementation] Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts
- [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS Activity Summar… Repository Activity Summary Bot