Re: [Taps] Comments on draft-gjessing-taps-minset-00

Brian Adamson <brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil> Fri, 26 June 2015 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379501B300A for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:44:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YwBP928252Ki for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ccs.nrl.navy.mil (mx0.ccs.nrl.navy.mil [IPv6:2001:480:20:118:118::211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C147F1B3006 for <taps@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 07:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macsimus.itd.nrl.navy.mil (macsimus.itd.nrl.navy.mil [132.250.92.151]) by ccs.nrl.navy.mil (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t5QEhcXD005783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:43:38 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0216B530-48FE-4315-AD16-CFBC6F09EB87"
From: Brian Adamson <brian.adamson@nrl.navy.mil>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
In-Reply-To: <c578df4811331b36948361fb6afcd358.squirrel@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 10:43:37 -0400
Message-Id: <3C9E35F3-1E24-4D93-A6B5-51CED1586E96@nrl.navy.mil>
References: <734fb5eae22df80e67a71fde5ad74204.squirrel@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <B12A213E-FA7E-414B-84AF-F3E94CB0AA34@ifi.uio.no> <c578df4811331b36948361fb6afcd358.squirrel@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
X-CCS-MailScanner: No viruses found.
X-CCS-MailScanner-Info: See: http://www.nrl.navy.mil/ccs/support/email
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/Mo5ddPmT7fim8omdPtWiXBi9CRM>
Cc: taps@ietf.org, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, Stein Gjessing <steing@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: Re: [Taps] Comments on draft-gjessing-taps-minset-00
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 14:44:18 -0000

Yes - the error detection for NORM since it rides on top of UDP is the same as UDP and you would not want to run NORM over UDP-Lite as NORM’s use of FEC is for packet erasure filling and not error correction.  I.e., it assumes any messages received are error-free.

>> 
>> Yes, so if we want to include NORM (or may be we should not in the initial
>> minimal version?)
>> then we must include that it supports error detection as in UDP (?).
>> 
> Yes - NORM is over UDP, and hence I think its error *detection* model is
> the same as UDP.