[Taps] adopting draft-gjessing-taps-minset
"Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 14:00 UTC
Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D30129A96 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AIMHORPpqgng for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B90129A92 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h67so20640379qke.0 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aOSFjFfp8Kylvt4gq91Ji9lzMh6KwwrOmDj1w9ON0R8=; b=IyW43cc4kwvBjAEeqLl/7ao90tPM3nogpQysPOANjXXY/nuUR1XqydIIkk0wgnXVfc 6982rksZpwDyWey3EllAOhFTaFagzO3NhPrLkrsDYdxqVuLdXXB+EkhKIBy+639zc3Gs DddMLB7lwQuT/y5R+uh2ihepr2VSGK8xRHeyVnUqWew5yGjTZnaX1RkdMCtvDeohJ9vP XpV/3qaVFxKzMIShdnR295/NdJK6YtsJlTqLoiWSQCeDsGJIeF1V1AxQxBEQPpn0BS0o w8E8B6le2cuRfos0WWO+u2kJTgnN9lmmymI6jB87peEHT1d3ya3gRhL92SHfatLvqnKz rOeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aOSFjFfp8Kylvt4gq91Ji9lzMh6KwwrOmDj1w9ON0R8=; b=NPSByzd3wrpsLuXQhtawxSiCyLzYmIEoGORwR7lm2RC974LW4vMn3tZ58VXWnH2Hph XByzjDawk3Ky9P2OSydeyrz7UtOSrB/VCNbmlRpeKCy7evXYBqbZC5PcjfykDcAEF8zY /bVp/9z2u2tmJk733IfzAk/x87+SmPBl4Wwo9UvQUKEFw6DHE80JjKBui82AyZCSmUj1 22lyWo8k01LWOr3IVpdu/8kYeauhbngZN+gD6ruyE7kaCXZcHRmSjyP+IU9ktPeC5oQV 343y4mtVYInzsnSYsHiaMDffyO/qroHKHyCQqB4l72c6/z+7MArUuvYbOsH42cg39VKv jpgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6f/v1wsNSEEKZJQHFuvP45+sJA5bFimKh58djmtPxiA2pWHjOz uU2knRBFcAqASU3NZBI=
X-Received: by 10.55.17.84 with SMTP id b81mr2604622qkh.167.1492610438683; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.35.43] ([2001:4878:8000:60:48d1:c44d:44d4:b83c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 1sm1898601qty.69.2017.04.19.07.00.37 for <taps@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: taps WG <taps@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:00:36 -0400
Message-ID: <11900EDB-ED8F-48F9-BD0C-0C1994C4FD1A@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_64562075-CE92-46CD-9984-3410BC619DF0_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5356)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/Rd1L5pNjQ7-06UcxlyHSL0auBQc>
Subject: [Taps] adopting draft-gjessing-taps-minset
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:00:41 -0000
Hi folks- In Chicago we discussed adopting the above-named draft as a wg doc for milestone #2. There was a small amount of support and no objections. I think folks aren’t that interested in milestone #2 but it does create a useful tool for guiding TAPS implementations. This is a call for discussion pro or con on TAPS adopting this draft. Relevant excerpt from the Chicago minutes below. —aaron ____ 2.2 draft-gjessing-taps-minset-04 , Stein Gjessing * Call for adoption * Aaron: call for hands of people who read the draft * 2 raised hands * Gorry: read the draft. Document seems as it should be. Not controversial. If the WG want a document in this space then it should be adopted. * Tommy Pauly: Agree with that. Certain parts in the discussion area that we should have more discussion on; word-smithing needed. A good thing to adopt: it has the right core in it. * Aaron: anybody from remote has a say on this? * Brian Trammell: "Yeah, do it." * Hannes Tschofenig: one question on scope, Are you trying to cover security layer into account? Shouldn't this cover security? for IoT any API document includes guidance for DTLS would be useful. * Aaron: Tried to get someone from security directorate to participate, but no one did, so we stuck with the stuff we knew. Would be useful to have an equivalent of TAPS that handled security stuff * Tommy: Any practical API guidance will need to include security. Can't leave it out. Is it possible to have another draft in TAPS that is the minset of security features * Aaron: might be a charter scope change, but might be entirely appropriate * Tommy: would try a draft with min-set format to include security features. * Aaron: Hannes would you be interested in this? yes. lets talk about it in the next meeting. * Gorry: Originally security was in-scope. would be cool to look at such draft.
- [Taps] adopting draft-gjessing-taps-minset Aaron Falk