IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-transport-security (ending 4/29)

"Aaron Falk" <aaron.falk@gmail.com> Mon, 22 April 2019 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A730C1200F9 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 06:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F5ih3SWGrdYE for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64196120025 for <taps@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id w73so4246830qkb.13 for <taps@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 06:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fqsXaEJmpm7CjAdzqQJQbtS+AFejPcNk5n0Es+KC8Uw=; b=K0ur3MGC37XxwjuZIA8A2/f3jiPvNq//hh/nRTQdFJUFqU0CPFwwNhgPsxXtmyFeL0 866H4GTQF1KAnFzQwRYuccAP5Ap6MsmbLUm5GtEsL0Q0e0KM+y0icYiNeXtZJ9DxysmC ehEDgBNGlRZcUIuS7NPJAEwS99g3W0yDop3Sxhgv9O66oyjGYNxZUXqBbbxa7QPzyECb 4zAe7oUb65FP6rtNlQVqM/FMjMSnD+q1LSTymqBARL1HThjdogaAqTTA2jtDOoyAaqf8 ThDEI8Rypji6fS2m19E5c43rkMxEtp5m8xdmxpfi3ZI8VIxyDNQUpr7ESOI7lqdZubqf +vBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fqsXaEJmpm7CjAdzqQJQbtS+AFejPcNk5n0Es+KC8Uw=; b=j8wdX/C8P00A7Gtib/WZcMOzkoj3VSrJhK+IXusHydO+NfdBmOwzdgNddZ9KvTfdFR gIpfXaD9KMgz0xfYW/bcRa1cU172yLqDUSAQZ5g3K3kpJu9I+LmVJZ0mwxIOGK8Zxf/f /VdHQupW/6wT4PWku5oypp0AO3WacRtofUtVc36Uff3KeMq8ajc+pwh8nbHScDM1kWcx mTotJ6gjrPE5+fGMnxuGOkhS7uyinh8CuYAR6iiz1MoojjKvuWV8PHYNUCIJbWHcCibK rR1KP6tezbQ0Y1dKELAXet+jib9TzW9wjzTSpjVVAIx4/46eZfI+fLqSN1Ss/KJpFVg5 DEOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX41v5Q/NpdTBZARrDAJsztblQ2xIpy+JhKLebgbXFZ/s1Kv6BL 20U+IaDzYYox5+Am5036/5I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzERA2dZ7oPIR9Aw2fTHmEgBLB9mPSLfqW3kYXKH2UZMmUUcTK8y64AfuibMXwGsDbYt4H/IA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:35c:: with SMTP id t28mr14581710qkm.24.1555940869263; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 06:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.32.131] ([2001:4878:a000:3000:80b2:c3b7:9acc:e90e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v23sm6351224qkf.11.2019.04.22.06.47.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Apr 2019 06:47:48 -0700 (PDT)
From: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: taps WG <taps@ietf.org>, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zaheduzzaman.sarker@ericsson.com>, "Rose, Kyle" <krose@akamai.com>, Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, Theresa Enghardt <theresa@inet.tu-berlin.de>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 09:47:44 -0400
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.12.4r5594)
Message-ID: <E1A262D5-8825-4A2F-9BD1-7D9BE38EF9E3@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5CBD9040.8000009@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <82AE6091-A19F-4478-9C96-47A2E05908FD@gmail.com> <B8E53553-2464-40C1-97C5-2E717A57618C@gmail.com> <5CBD9040.8000009@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_MailMate_5BDEEA4C-B00F-487C-8DC6-978C869EF3F7_="
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/ty2xYqd5Id9ttYimrkNNFfIk0JE>
Subject: Re: [Taps] WGLC for draft-ietf-taps-transport-security (ending 4/29)
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 13:47:52 -0000

Hi Gorry,

On 22 Apr 2019, at 5:58, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:

> Scoping and potential use to endorse non-ietf protocols:
>
> As a technical question to the Chairs/AD - does the document need to 
> carry some caveat about non-IETF protocols being standardised outside 
> the RFC-series and not making a statement on recommending or otherwise 
> endorsing their use?

As this document is intended for Informational status and not, say, BCP 
or standards track, I think there is no implicit endorsement.  I felt 
the text was clear that it is a descriptive analysis of various 
protocols.  So, my view is that nothing else is needed.  Nevertheless, 
I’m open to hearing other opinions.

--aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email