IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tcpcrypt] Draft charter text

Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi> Tue, 15 April 2014 07:57 UTC

Return-Path: <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92461A031E for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ddo0e0FMfVUe for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jenni1.inet.fi (mta-out.inet.fi [195.156.147.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E38A1A0393 for <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pc114.netlab.hut.fi (130.233.154.114) by jenni1.inet.fi (8.5.140.03) (authenticated as saropa-1) id 53469565005D8E1A; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:57:16 +0300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Pasi Sarolahti <pasi.sarolahti@iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <16087_1397533678_534CABEE_16087_119_1_534CABDB.2040506@mti-systems.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 10:57:15 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3AC63F43-9F04-42B9-8B5D-5F99447D52E8@iki.fi>
References: <20140413204202.GJ34745@funkthat.com> <534B6D5E.1000003@isi.edu> <20140414163222.GW34745@funkthat.com> <534C11F2.3030607@isi.edu> <20140414212743.0pb8ilb4gocskos0@webcartero01.uc3m.es> <534C3A74.9050109@isi.edu> <534C3E9A.9080707@mti-systems.com> <20140414222206.tpy3rfnef44g4wgg@webcartero01.uc3m.es> <534C450F.5010808@isi.edu> <20140414223951.dxh8n99o1wkksgks@webcartero01.uc3m.es> <20140414221832.GA61630@banjo.employees.org> <16087_1397533678_534CABEE_16087_119_1_534CABDB.2040506@mti-systems.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpcrypt/K-FwsTDVC9hgbEa0fLpR1EVcfaU
Cc: tcpcrypt@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tcpcrypt] Draft charter text
X-BeenThere: tcpcrypt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpcrypt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpcrypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpcrypt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 07:57:35 -0000

On 15 Apr 2014, at 06:47, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote:

>> So then,  should we also take on the work of defining how to negotiate
>> an increased option space?
>> 
>> I seem to recall that was previously mentioned (on tcpm?),
>> but don't know if it got anywhere.
> 
> Joe summarized the situation well.  One I-D discussing it is:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eddy-tcp-loo-04

This idea comes up every once in a while. Perhaps it would be useful to describe the issues in a small informational RFC?

- Pasi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email