new version of TCP Congestion Control
Mark Allman <mallman@lerc.nasa.gov> Fri, 18 December 1998 17:51 UTC
X-Authentication-Warning: assateague-fi.lerc.nasa.gov: listserv set sender to owner-tcp-impl@lerc.nasa.gov using -f
Message-Id: <199812181751.MAA07588@guns.lerc.nasa.gov>
To: tcp-impl@lerc.nasa.gov
Cc: Vern Paxson <vern@ee.lbl.gov>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@lerc.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: mallman@lerc.nasa.gov
Subject: new version of TCP Congestion Control
Organization: Late Night Hackers, NASA Lewis, Cleveland, Ohio
Song-of-the-Day: Friend Of The Devil
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 12:51:21 -0500
Sender: owner-tcp-impl@lerc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1226
Lines: 30
Folks- We just sent in a new version of the ``TCP Congestion Control'' I-D (which will be draft-ietf-tcpimpl-cong-control-02.txt). It should be available from the archives soon. You can grab a copy of the I-D, as well as context and word diffs between this version and the last version at: http://gigahertz.lerc.nasa.gov/~mallman/share/tcpimpl/ The following changes were either minor editting nits or in response to things raised in the last call period... -Minor wording tweaks -Changed the allowed initial window from 1*MSS to up to 2*MSS, per the short discussion in Orlando. -We deleted the MSS definition and replaced it with two new definitions. SMSS, which is the segment size the sender uses (per the MTU or Path MTU Discovery, or whatever). And, RMSS is the segment size announced by the receiver in the MSS option (or the default, if the option is not used). Hopefully, by using more specific terms, we have made the text more clear. We believe there is strong concensus for this document now and plan is to send this document to the IESG soon (probably next week with the newreno draft, assuming no large objections to that document appear before the WG last-call ends next Tuesday). allman
- new version of TCP Congestion Control Mark Allman
- Re: new version of TCP Congestion Control Vern Paxson
- Re: new version of TCP Congestion Control Neal Cardwell
- Re: new version of TCP Congestion Control Mark Allman