Re: [tcpinc] CORRECTION: Reminder: Ongoing Working Group Last Call about drafts to choose as WG item

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Mon, 10 August 2015 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D3E1B374E for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.811
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.811 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LXnbeHHbWVVH for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 847981B3775 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:43412 helo=COMSEC.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1ZOpZ8-000FND-Q6 for tcpinc@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:04:46 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
To: tcpinc@ietf.org
References: <55B20277.7050304@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55C8CB9E.6020101@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:04:46 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55B20277.7050304@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/26WAQm3dmwQ6wtbZjd5wnBbayY0>
Subject: Re: [tcpinc] CORRECTION: Reminder: Ongoing Working Group Last Call about drafts to choose as WG item
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:04:56 -0000

I prefer that both drafts be accepted as WG items, so that we can
evaluate the evolution of both in the WG context.

Steve
>
> Dear all,
>
> **Please use this CORRECTED version, as one option to choose from 
> below didn't make it into the original.****
> Thanks to Erik Rescola for pointing this out to me directly.
>
> This point got lost on the mailing list, but it has been decided in 
> the WG session here at IETF-93 that there will be a Last Call for 
> consensus about which document of the below ones to take as starting 
> point for the WG.
>
>
> Here are the two drafts:
> a) draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option-03
> b) draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-03
>
> Please respond to the tcpinc wg mailing list until
>
>    July 31st, 2015
>    1pm CEST
>
> on wether you prefer
> - either draft a) or b)
> - both drafts (a & b) as WG items
> - or none
>
> to be accepted as WG item(s).
>
> Please write also your brief reasoning on why you made your choice.
>
> Please note that accepting a draft is not the end of working on the 
> technical content of the draft, but it is actually the starting point 
> when the WG has full change control about the content of the draft!
>
>
> Regards,
>
>   Martin Stiemerling
>   Transport Area Director
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tcpinc mailing list
> Tcpinc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
>