[tcpinc] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-17: (with COMMENT)
Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Sun, 26 November 2017 16:54 UTC
Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C9F81286CA; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 08:54:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno@ietf.org, David Black <david.black@dell.com>, tcpinc-chairs@ietf.org, david.black@dell.com, tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.66.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151171524963.16120.9058882195648633025.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 08:54:09 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/uriS7-tMBt7Y3xiWYrKMZ7aW4CE>
Subject: [tcpinc] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Working group mailing list for TCP Increased Security \(tcpinc\)" <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 16:54:10 -0000
Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-17: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In Section 10 RFC 5802 would be a better example than RFC 7616, because the former already has a slot for "channel binding" (session-id being an example) information and generally improves on security properties of Digest.
- [tcpinc] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpi… Alexey Melnikov