[tcpinc] adoption of draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option-05

Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Tue, 03 November 2015 01:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55071ACD3F for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:12:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jvzWiStyJNmp for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:12:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C18891ACD2E for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:12:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1E3D9304; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:12:06 +0100 (MET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id tTQ8R9NF1IKX; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:12:06 +0100 (MET)
Received: from dhcp-35-88.meeting.ietf94.jp (dhcp-35-88.meeting.ietf94.jp [133.93.35.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mirjak) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30C8ED9302; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 02:12:04 +0100 (MET)
From: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:11:59 +0900
Message-Id: <78BE308A-3D2C-4704-B7E4-6E1B35272466@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
To: tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/vYjxxnpmGql5s9hv44kXt1nErQI>
Cc: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Subject: [tcpinc] adoption of draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option-05
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 01:12:09 -0000

Hi all,

we’ve seen large support of draft-rescorla-tcpinc-tls-option-05 to be adopted as wg item with some negative feedback to not support it. However, there is large interest in this approach. As we did not see significant reasons to hold back further work on this proposal, we will move forward and adopt it as wg item.

Thanks for your feedback!

@authors: Please go ahead and submit the prepared -06 version of your draft as draft-ietf-tcpinc-use-tls-00! We are proposing a name change here because there is actually not TCP option in this draft anymore (all moved to tcp-eno). Let us know in case you don’t agree with this new name and/or prefer a different one.

David & Mirja