[tcpm] Current status of TCPM
"SCHARF, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 10 November 2011 19:22 UTC
Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979DA21F8ADC; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:22:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eCq31xWc-oT6; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailrelay2.alcatel.de (mailrelay2.alcatel.de [194.113.59.96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E79621F8A6C; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:22:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SLFSNX.rcs.alcatel-research.de (slfsn1.rcs.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.60.98]) by mailrelay2.alcatel.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id pAAJM2Pt027319; Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:22:02 +0100
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:21:59 +0100
Message-ID: <133D9897FB9C5E4E9DF2779DC91E947C0693A8B4@SLFSNX.rcs.alcatel-research.de>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Current status of TCPM
Thread-Index: Acyf3gRspP5Rq7hWStOd1YdeEE1iVA==
From: "SCHARF, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 149.204.45.73
Cc: tcpm-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [tcpm] Current status of TCPM
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:22:05 -0000
Dear all,
please find below the current status of drafts in TCPM, as far as I am
aware of it.
Please let the chairs know if you have any comments, preferably before
the TCPM meeting next week.
Thanks
Michael (TCPM co-chair)
Recent RFCs
===========
WG Items Nearing RFC Publication
================================
Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition
draft-ietf-tcpm-persist
Milestone Target: Informational
Status: RFC Editor Queue
1948bis
draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc1948bis
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in September 2011
Status: IESG processing
The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm
draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc3782-bis
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2011
Status: IESG processing
WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC
============================================
MSS Option
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
Status: Needs revision
Action: Action with David Borman
Active WG Items
===============
1323bis
draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
Status: Needs revision
Action: Action with David Borman
SACK Entry / RFC 3517bis
draft-blanton-tcpm-3517bis
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010
Status: Probably ready for WGLC
Action: WGLC planned
TCP Security
draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security
Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010
Status: Content needs work, draft expired
Action: Potential removal of charter item
Increasing the Initial Window
draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd
Milestone Target: Experimental in September 2011
Status: WG consensus on experimental track
Action: Document update needed
Proportional Rate Reduction for TCP
draft-ietf-tcpm-proportional-rate-reduction
Milestone Target: Experimental in May 2012
Status: Under active discussion / review
Action: Continue discussion
Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items
=========================================
Active Internet-Drafts
======================
TCP Fast Open
draft-cheng-tcpm-fastopen
Status: Discussions on list, some support for adoption in IETF 81, no
clear consensus so far
Action: Presentation at IETF 82
Shared Use of Experimental TCP Options
draft-touch-tcpm-experimental-options
Status: Some discussions on list
Action: Presentation at IETF 82
Automating the Initial Window in TCP
draft-touch-tcpm-automatic-iw
Status: Interest in working group, but no consensus on adoption in IETF
81
Action: Document update needed, presentation at IETF 82
Accurate ECN Feedback in TCP
draft-kuehlewind-conex-accurate-ecn
Status: Discussion moved from CONEX to TCPM
Action: Presentation at IETF 82
Accurate ECN Feedback Option in TCP
draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-accurate-ecn-option
Status: New draft
Action: Presentation at IETF 82
Additional negotiation in the TCP Timestamp Option field during the TCP
handshake
draft-scheffenegger-tcpm-timestamp-negotiation
Status: Presented at IETF 80, discussions on list
Action: Presentation at IETF 82
TCP and SCTP RTO Restart
draft-hurtig-tcpm-rtorestart
Status: New draft
Action: Presentation at IETF 82
(+ many expired Internet-Drafts)
- [tcpm] Current status of TCPM SCHARF, Michael