[tcpm] WG status pre-IETF80
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 28 March 2011 07:49 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472283A68D2 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p0xIufeZ539m for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr10.networksolutionsemail.com (omr10.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C5C3A68C7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr1 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr10.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p2S7pR15000649 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:51:28 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr1 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [94.75.220.77] ([94.75.220.77:57272] helo=[10.9.0.26]) by cm-omr1 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 11/4F-06416-FFD309D4; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 03:51:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4D903DFD.5050504@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:51:25 +0200
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [tcpm] WG status pre-IETF80
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:49:52 -0000
Hello; below is a snapshot of TCPM status from the chairs prior to the IETF80 meeting. As usual, we may have made mistakes, so please correct us, if needed. As a reminder, there is currently a poll on the TCP AO document proposed as a WG item, and we are also still searching for reviewer volunteers for portions of the tcp-security recommendations. Please let us know your thoughts on either. Recent RFCs =========== RFC 6093 - On the Implementation of the TCP Urgent Mechanism (January, 2011) WG Items Nearing RFC Publication ================================ draft-eggert-tcpm-historicize Milestone Target: Informational in October 2010 Status: in RFC-Editor's queue draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-timestamps Milestone Target: Informational Status: in RFC-Editor's queue draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in March 2011 Status: publication requested on 3/22/11 WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC ============================================ Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition draft-ietf-tcpm-persist Milestone Target: Informational Status: finished WGLC, needs update to resolve comments Action: need to make changes in response to suggestions to remove appendix w/ API and one of the recommendations MSS Option draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 Status: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended) 2nd WGLC started at IETF 77, and is ended with few comments Action: David will check with commenters from first WGLC to see if issues are closed Wes/Michael will write PROTO and send to the IESG, after WGLC starts and completes Active WG Items =============== 1323bis draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 Status: Needs revision Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman) TCP Security draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010 Status: content needs work Action: need to have people review this; possibly in individual sections (few volunteers so far) SACK Entry / RFC 3517bis draft-blanton-tcpm-3517bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010 Action: ready for WGLC? (need to identify as WG doc in tracker) Increasing the Initial Window draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd Milestone Target: August 2011 to determine intended status September 2011 to publish document Status: under active discussion / review Action: determine intended status through continued WG discussion NewReno Update draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc3782-bis Status: probably ready for WGLC Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2011 Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items ========================================= AO NAT draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat Status: IETF 77 discussion determined this should be Experimental, whether or not it is a WG document; need to ask TCPM list Action: poll started on 3/16/11, to close 3/30/11 Other Proposals Not Yet Decided On ================================== draft-allman-tcpm-bump-initcwnd draft-allman-tcpm-rto-consider draft-bittau-tcp-crypt draft-cheng-tcpm-fastopen draft-fairhurst-tcpm-newcwv draft-gont-tcpm-rfc1948bis draft-hurtig-tcpm-rtorestart draft-mathis-tcpm-proportional-rate-reduction draft-scheffenegger-tcpm-sack-loss-recovery draft-scheffenegger-tcpm-timestamp-negotiation draft-touch-tcpm-automatic-iw draft-mongazon-tcpm-tcp-rehash Status: discussed on-list, lack of consensus draft-anumita-tcpm-stronger-checksum Status: discussed on-list, mingled with historicize draft discussion draft-duan-tcpm-tcp-ao-rekeying Status: discussed in Anaheim and on-list; motivations and usefulness was questioned draft-huang-tcpm-tcp-eack Status: discussed on-list; there seems to be agreement that ACK congestion control (RFC 5690) will mitigate the issue Older & Expired Documents Discussed =================================== discussions on Rate-Halving draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether it needs to be revived Faster Application Handshakes with SYN/ACK Payloads expired draft-agl-tcpm-sadata Status: expired; not specifically polled for adoption in WG draft-ycheng-tcpm-rtosynrtt Status: has been suggested as either an addition to 2988bis or to initcwnd documents discussion with authors indicates that this is superceded by the other changes in the 2988bis document Documents Not Adopted by WG =========================== TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery Status: discussed on mailing list and updated in response poll for working group adoption opened on 12/9, responses desired by 12/23 decision not to adopt by WG; IESG may allow publication and option number assignment at their discretion, but TCPM does not have consensus to do this work background presented at IETF 77 authors are working with other vendors on a separate mailing list draft-sridharan-tcpm-ctcp Status: polled for interest on 6/16/10 one positive response; no negative - too weak for adoption Other TCP Documents =================== TCP Cookie Transactions (TCPCT) RFC 6013 Other WG Activities =================== Errata Review for legacy TCP RFCs (many outstanding) -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems
- [tcpm] WG status pre-IETF80 Wesley Eddy