Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis-06.txt
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Mon, 26 February 2024 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <ncardwell@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118AFC15171B for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:37:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -22.607
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-22.607 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GE1PQPVd7IdI for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:37:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F889C15107C for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:37:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5a03933eb55so1396305eaf.1 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:37:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1708961837; x=1709566637; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SdeOTv/FzEviw99YP0ume1gX/Vt8mVnJ8Sx/YOdAhL4=; b=q57olvV1tasyVCC8xTEmPD5Le8U9xQsHho3pWduJsw35Oqn10fFOLeoTZLUuQz5Amj 2T81ELfruikTBTuMUl06dc64fkK0u6mPqeEK4RPM6vrMAJG5jy3AzWXhFkGadowvedQK ebyQFynyGX6J/R3UtpqBmrp+N9Phdp5/nsug/NPqKBu+Czmz8AkWO8ue0/56ZppdBgS+ InvEnpcFwVIpsWXbYG389HTFyxMDywh05NL7l5C32355/hooLqcAJiWoa3m2YeqaQhsh jJ6jnURv+u/CUDjUre5m5fmivivjSDqiMHo0XQE9l71UwrtJ6FpXzUnzAcCDGFbMCaJA 650A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708961837; x=1709566637; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=SdeOTv/FzEviw99YP0ume1gX/Vt8mVnJ8Sx/YOdAhL4=; b=WHghws7diB0hf7gel4rupW3IZCbWY5v3COobQIoY0zsF9AVPpbxmlMiG6tLRhB1N01 PIFPWIDNyJC9ASZBCXTcVuA6QFe3tv4nMIehv9ax5jyNCRkOuHLR6F1HvPzFKioB6QcR XO9WiNJVVZq1Oc5cT3tZa73PRq51FJ2SpfuRgMu+CfOizsBjIFLhYrfnhgM2J8oyenB4 LQvzTlnPNXp7y7tI7tQVkWtBHN9NCRPdldZuYMuaFu3D4Urm0mzgzc1ofbQ1rwl0b4JC UdE/n9cCIzvvLlFYKcAD0tytfb0H767Hv9JEeRug9qjzXDSS4OW1wTiR0xN727mO16LW CXOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxeLpdaifLAuqrlRmwp42PwTcjph0nDdFdC+tK2IN5PMoSioKTQ +xyOu8CLnSs0FVYkJ58sGuotnVH4lzIfEsIdbLk0SOv7bociX0o9xgY6mnudzg3QOzH0xNpU6xV cVGhBGxhNL2YsP+ffFkEO4n8UZ9PqRQywKud+ro72AKnBTKtkbJ1j
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGI3nsnby2LfKAcTxchX2nXyEiCGX8hcSFQSk4DTmuqk4sY0cJF+EzEyjsb+ChsCy2fPTxt/mqYHmIXlIjWIOA=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:511:b0:21e:d17f:8693 with SMTP id s17-20020a056871051100b0021ed17f8693mr8799356oal.56.1708961836897; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:37:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170896098131.16189.4842811868600508870@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <170896098131.16189.4842811868600508870@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 10:36:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CADVnQy=rvCoQC0RwVq=P2XWFGPrXvGKvj2cAooj94yx+WzXz3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Cc: Matt Mathis <mattmathis@measurementlab.net>, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>, Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003a170506124aaf9b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/1SDXHy0c0IHxxWC8umDO21504os>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 15:37:19 -0000
As noted in the draft, revision 06 primarily has a single change relative to 05: it updates RecoverFS to be initialized as "RecoverFS = pipe" in both the prose and pseudocode. Thanks to Richard Scheffenegger and the TCPM community for reviewing the 05 revision. Comments/suggestions welcome! Thanks! neal On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 10:23 AM <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis-06.txt is now available. It > is a > work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) WG of the > IETF. > > Title: Proportional Rate Reduction for TCP > Authors: Matt Mathis > Nandita Dukkipati > Yuchung Cheng > Neal Cardwell > Name: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis-06.txt > Pages: 17 > Dates: 2024-02-26 > > Abstract: > > This document updates the experimental Proportional Rate Reduction > (PRR) algorithm, described RFC 6937, to standards track. PRR > provides logic to regulate the amount of data sent by TCP or other > transport protocols during fast recovery. PRR accurately regulates > the actual flight size through recovery such that at the end of > recovery it will be as close as possible to the slow start threshold > (ssthresh), as determined by the congestion control algorithm. > > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis/ > > There is also an HTML version available at: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis-06.html > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis-06 > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at: > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm >
- [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc6937bis… internet-drafts
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Markku Kojo
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Yoshifumi Nishida
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Markku Kojo
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Yoshifumi Nishida
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Yoshifumi Nishida
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Matt Mathis
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Matt Mathis
- [tcpm] About growing cwnd when the sender is rate… Michael Welzl
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Markku Kojo
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Markku Kojo
- [tcpm] Re: About growing cwnd when the sender is … Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: About growing cwnd when the sender is … Michael Welzl
- [tcpm] Re: About growing cwnd when the sender is … Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: About growing cwnd when the sender is … Michael Welzl
- [tcpm] Re: About growing cwnd when the sender is … Michael Welzl
- [tcpm] Re: About growing cwnd when the sender is … Christian Huitema
- [tcpm] Re: About growing cwnd when the sender is … Michael Welzl
- [tcpm] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpm-prr-rfc693… Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Markku Kojo
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Neal Cardwell
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Markku Kojo
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Yoshifumi Nishida
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Markku Kojo
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Matt Mathis
- [tcpm] Re: PRR behaviour on detecting loss of a r… Neal Cardwell