IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Reminder: WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-26

tuexen@fh-muenster.de Mon, 06 November 2023 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16782C1D470C for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 02:49:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b_ZLsgsqvW8B for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 02:49:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de (mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de [212.201.120.206]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECB7EC1D4706 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 02:49:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de (mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de [185.149.215.227]) by mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CCDCE066A; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:41:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-9716.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.151.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tuexen) by mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0963B1A0064; Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:41:24 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F6FF89CE-49D1-4A5E-870E-7C67E8971BD9"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.200.91.1.1\))
From: tuexen@fh-muenster.de
In-Reply-To: <347C33E0-FDFD-4ED9-93FD-397AE361D6DE@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 11:41:24 +0100
Cc: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1F44EBB6-FEC6-48CA-99AC-F7C9569C7344@fh-muenster.de>
References: <1204E97B-9524-4C9F-8D06-7F81E1F28A6F@fh-muenster.de> <347C33E0-FDFD-4ED9-93FD-397AE361D6DE@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Markku Kojo <kojo=40cs.helsinki.fi@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.200.91.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/3DJPTOB1-4oK-vv_1vdsKmj0p5g>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Reminder: WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-26
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2023 10:49:08 -0000

> On Nov 6, 2023, at 11:09, Markku Kojo <kojo=40cs.helsinki.fi@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> catching up…
> 
> I am afraid that the crucial piece not addressed is that this approach assumes that by enabling SACK would also enable DSACK in full which is not the case. Therefore, the suggested rule in ECN++ does not result in correct operation for RACK-TLP and F-RTO. It requires correct impöementation at both ends.
> 
> I’ve already tried to explain this earlier but try to come up with a detailed list clarifying the actions needed at each end later today.
Hi Markku,

the AccECN document is almost handed over to the responsible AD. This does not mean that there
can not be made improvements during AD review or the IETF LC. The ECN++ is before WGLC.
Any concrete suggestions will be considered as long as they are made timely.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> /Markku
> 
> 
>> tuexen@fh-muenster.de kirjoitti 27.10.2023 kello 19.35:
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 21, 2023, at 19:51, tuexen@fh-muenster.de wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear all,
>>> 
>>> this e-mail is a gentle reminder for the 2nd working group last call for
>>> draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-26.
>>> 
>>> The WGLC runs until Friday, September 22nd 2023.
>>> 
>>> Please send any comments, including indications to support this document,
>>> to the TCMP mailing list by then.
>>> 
>>> In particular, if you have made comments during the first WGLC, indicate whether
>>> the comments have been addressed or not.
>>> 
>>> The ID is available at
>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-26.html
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> based on the feedback, the WG chairs have declared consensus on this document.
>> We do understand that not all all feedback provided was addressed in a way
>> expected by the person giving the feedback.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> Michael
>>> 
>>> Best regards
>>> Michael
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tcpm mailing list
>> tcpm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email