IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-01

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Thu, 19 December 2013 09:35 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEB31AE2A0 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:35:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O9q8JZK2ogPT for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out2.uio.no (mail-out2.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::58]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8E81AE265 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-mx2.uio.no ([129.240.10.30]) by mail-out2.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1Vta0Q-0004q3-7s; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:34:58 +0100
Received: from 089144207237.atnat0016.highway.bob.at ([89.144.207.237] helo=[192.168.1.2]) by mail-mx2.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1Vta0P-0004H4-GZ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:34:58 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F25F46778@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:34:53 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4329FC84-000C-48AF-B1A2-06E40785F34C@ifi.uio.no>
References: <E4F761E0-A42E-4B0F-A243-3B3A5D2834DA@kau.se> <CAK6E8=fRnZ3Z8322Vzg6rGMxx7KngfktcCHMLJPJUdGCfZuFpA@mail.gmail.com> <012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F25F46778@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
To: "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 9 msgs/h 4 sum rcpts/h 13 sum msgs/h 7 total rcpts 11090 max rcpts/h 44 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 8103BF7C97C333D340F1095607CBEA67C05ADC2A
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 89.144.207.237 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 4 total 20 max/h 6 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Comments on draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-01
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:35:05 -0000

On 19. des. 2013, at 10:24, "Scheffenegger, Richard" <rs@netapp.com> wrote:

> 
> Hi Per,
> 
>>> (i) Should we have a section in the draft describing a socket option?
>> 
>> What're the useful cases in your mind?
> 
> I don't think that a granularity on a per-session level would really do any good; having a global sysctl (or similar) to influence the overall behavior of the stack is fine. But from a troubleshooting point of view, I doubt that such a fine level of control will do any good.

+1

Cheers,
Michael

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status