[tcpm] Ref to timestamp negotiation draft (expired)

Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Wed, 16 November 2016 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52532129530 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:00:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yj1MAdi-tIr9 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:00:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server.dnsblock1.com (server.dnsblock1.com [85.13.236.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776C2126CD8 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 17:00:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [125.177.184.81] (port=33689 helo=[192.168.219.101]) by server.dnsblock1.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1c6oa2-0001f7-PU; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 01:00:03 +0000
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Message-ID: <67dbb3ef-4671-8b91-fc51-538e8c890544@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:59:59 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5CC7A0FC15734EFC881758E9"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.dnsblock1.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.dnsblock1.com: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: server.dnsblock1.com: in@bobbriscoe.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/6Ht_-hwkKIvtRAwhQr-fKSYzbD0>
Cc: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: [tcpm] Ref to timestamp negotiation draft (expired)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 01:00:06 -0000

Neil, [re-sending from correct address, so it is acceptable to the tcpm 
list]

As promised in the discussion just now about your timer negotiation talk 
in tcpm, here's the previous draft on a similar subject:
Additional negotiation in the TCP Timestamp Option field during the TCP 
handshake 
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-scheffenegger-tcpm-timestamp-negotiation-05>

This was originally prompted by the research here (see section 3.1 for 
the timestamp discussion), which you might also be interested in:
Chirping for Congestion Control - Implementation Feasibility 
<http://www.bobbriscoe.net/pubs.html#chirp_impl>



Bob

PS. I can recommend a good search engine to find stuff like this :)


-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/