Re: [tcpm] Accurate ECN side-meeting

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Tue, 31 July 2012 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A00411E80E4 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6uiNyFIgJfyt for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr9.networksolutionsemail.com (omr9.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.59]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6821311E80F5 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr11 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr9.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6V1brpr016000 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:37:53 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr11 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [95.211.92.234] ([95.211.92.234:30949] helo=[10.8.0.42]) by cm-omr11 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id 42/40-25600-EE637105; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:37:53 -0400
Message-ID: <501736E8.6060103@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 21:37:44 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
References: <012C3117EDDB3C4781FD802A8C27DD4F0D4DA610@SACEXCMBX02-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <A6B45266685BCD49876ABB5AF8EE5BF814676FB5@CH1PRD0310MB369.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAK6E8=dP_X3ZJAvPEr0YcVREDeabrUNxgdS9eUbP9DBUBD+aRg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=dP_X3ZJAvPEr0YcVREDeabrUNxgdS9eUbP9DBUBD+aRg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>, "tcpm (tcpm@ietf.org)" <tcpm@ietf.org>, Yu-Shun Wang <Yu-Shun.Wang@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Accurate ECN side-meeting
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 01:37:55 -0000

On 7/30/2012 9:08 PM, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> 
> Some dumb questions:
> 1. is tcpm the right place for that? if not is there a better one?

I think it's the right place, with responsible AD hat on :)

-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems