IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] RFC 6298

"Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> Sun, 10 March 2019 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889F11278CF for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 08:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qtyhbyDBc1yV for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 08:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de (mail.hs-esslingen.de [134.108.32.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A1ED127817 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 08:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D63725A17; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 16:31:54 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hs-esslingen.de; s=mail; t=1552231914; bh=9IwHY9VsZuEDjHecbfAyOaeT4b/QoDnmKPOrj7AHKoY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=sI76IBj05z4W7ujfVcqvBfN02UIhi1zgryPihYNznZbjUFqrdAMaItwwM/kS0CxPP 1EIrNVRmRt4ApLGEKNkkAis5zmrOlzqV+XOJmQ0Ki1dTySVqthmXOb211VEWx7+pnn yu/uWoMTSOrXsmZTFOPJ5ZEI9wlmqYo2JmcKZN4Q=
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.7.1 (20120429) (Debian) at hs-esslingen.de
Received: from mail.hs-esslingen.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hs-esslingen.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ILd9Klz_M8ni; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 16:31:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de (rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.29.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hs-esslingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 16:31:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from RZNT8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([169.254.3.183]) by rznt8101.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de ([fe80::bd73:d6a9:24d7:95f1%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 16:31:53 +0100
From: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
To: Jonathan Walter <jwalter03@frostburg.edu>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RFC 6298
Thread-Index: AQHU1rcC7jsh4P0lCEiAdwabPwjz5qYE/tJQ
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:31:53 +0000
Message-ID: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D2534BF@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
References: <SN4PR0701MB377691BE579AE6AF8D12A9F2AE4E0@SN4PR0701MB3776.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SN4PR0701MB377691BE579AE6AF8D12A9F2AE4E0@SN4PR0701MB3776.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [134.108.29.249]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D2534BFrznt8114rzntrzd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/7mprT432ZV2dLNrH4SJ_5ZCXoPw>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] RFC 6298
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:32:00 -0000

Hi Jon,

You can parse the list archive of the TCPM working group, most notably for the term "rfc2988bis":

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/?q=rfc2988bis

That, as well as the appendix of RFC 6298, is probably a good starting point.

Best regards

Michael


From: tcpm [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Walter
Sent: Saturday, March 9, 2019 9:35 PM
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: [tcpm] RFC 6298

Dear IETF,

I am studying computer science at Frostburg State University and doing a mini research project on calculating RTO timer.
I am interested in background discussions around changes that were made when the latest RFC was revised in 2011, especially around how the 1 second minimum was determined and why it was reduced to that from 3 seconds.  Please could you let me know if there is a public discussion board that would have background discussions posted I could read to gets some background history?

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Jon Walter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email