[tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5961 (4845)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 27 October 2016 19:26 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31DE129739 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:26:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id etBEJ-uI_sWp for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14BE12970F for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CC3B8B803A6; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:26:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: ananth@cisco.com, randall@lakerest.net, mdalal@cisco.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, ietf@kuehlewind.net, nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp, michael.scharf@nokia.com, tuexen@fh-muenster.de
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20161027192657.CC3B8B803A6@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:26:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/9ROBrPepxglS00j7ARWwq-cItZM>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 08:01:36 -0700
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, tuexen@fh-muenster.de, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5961 (4845)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:27:00 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5961, "Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5961&eid=4845 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Michael Tüxen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de> Section: 3.2 Original Text ------------- 1) If the RST bit is set and the sequence number is outside the current receive window (SEG.SEQ <= RCV.NXT || SEG.SEQ > RCV.NXT+ RCV.WND), silently drop the segment. Corrected Text -------------- 1) If the RST bit is set and the sequence number is outside the current receive window (SEG.SEQ < RCV.NXT || SEG.SEQ >= RCV.NXT+ RCV.WND), silently drop the segment. Notes ----- The condition being corrected should be the opposite of (RCV.NXT <= SEG.SEQ < RCV.NXT+RCV.WND), which is stated in the second item of the enumeration. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5961 (draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-13) -------------------------------------- Title : Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks Publication Date : August 2010 Author(s) : A. Ramaiah, R. Stewart, M. Dalal Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5961 (4845) RFC Errata System
- [tcpm] [Errata Verified] RFC5961 (4845) RFC Errata System