Re: [tcpm] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc1948bis

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 27 June 2011 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF8811E807A for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ykh3VF1PfwNp for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr16.networksolutionsemail.com (omr16.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EE221F8587 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr9 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr16.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p5RGDikN010887 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:13:48 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr9 smtp.user=wes@mti-systems.com; auth=pass (PLAIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from [107.46.176.128] ([107.46.176.128:55362] helo=[192.168.9.2]) by cm-omr9 (envelope-from <wes@mti-systems.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id CE/F2-10086-73CA80E4; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:13:44 -0400
Message-ID: <4E08AC37.8030205@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:13:43 -0400
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
References: <2BD9239D-7DCE-4AC7-838F-BA915AABC756@windriver.com> <4DEF05F3.4050505@mti-systems.com> <4E05E8EB.8080504@gont.com.ar> <4E063B33.9000504@mti-systems.com> <4E085FE0.90706@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <4E085FE0.90706@gont.com.ar>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Start of WGLC for draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc1948bis
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:14:36 -0000

On 6/27/2011 6:48 AM, Fernando Gont wrote:
 >
>> I would perhaps append to the end something like:
>> "However, implementations should consider the trade-offs involved in
>> using functions with stronger security properties, and employ them
>> if it is deemed reasonable."
>
> Should I s/reasonable/appropriate/?

That would be fine with me.


-- 
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems