[tcpm] Updated draft-tcpm-moncaster-tcp-rcv-cheat-01
<toby.moncaster@bt.com> Thu, 07 June 2007 09:46 UTC
Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwEZw-0008C6-NK; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 05:46:52 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwEZu-0008A4-Pu for tcpm@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 05:46:50 -0400
Received: from smtp4.smtp.bt.com ([217.32.164.151]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwEZs-0002pT-65 for tcpm@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 05:46:50 -0400
Received: from E03MVZ4-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net ([193.113.30.62]) by smtp4.smtp.bt.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 10:46:47 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:46:33 +0100
Message-ID: <BAB4DC0CD5148948A86BD047A85CE2A702FD9BF0@E03MVZ4-UKDY.domain1.systemhost.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Updated draft-tcpm-moncaster-tcp-rcv-cheat-01
Thread-Index: Aceo6LvGGjjRXsxWTZemDvQ63DYD9w==
From: toby.moncaster@bt.com
To: tcpm@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jun 2007 09:46:47.0221 (UTC) FILETIME=[C3AE5650:01C7A8E8]
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7da5a831c477fb6ef97f379a05fb683c
Cc: rbriscoe@jungle.bt.co.uk
Subject: [tcpm] Updated draft-tcpm-moncaster-tcp-rcv-cheat-01
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1324088048=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, We have now submitted a new version of our draft for testing TCP receiver's responses to packet re-ordering and loss. We have incorporated all the comments that were received in response to the initial draft. Hopefully this new version will prove more acceptable to the people who had concerns about the initial version. Hopefully it will be uploaded onto the ID shadow directory shortly. In the meantime, HTML and txt versions of the draft can be found here: http://www.jungle.bt.co.uk/people/rbriscoe/ext/pubs.html#tcp-rcv-cheat The main changes that we have made are: Clarified that this is testing whether receivers are compliant with TCP regarding responding to out-of-order segments Highlighted that we don't expect all TCP implementations to incorporate this test Added text on possible interactions with other TCP variants Our overall aim with this draft is to set out a safe method to test receiver compliance with TCP over packet reordering so that if optimistic acknowledgements do materialise as a threat, the IETF already have a safe solution that can be used to counter the threat. We would welcome any comments, especially if people still feel uneasy about the overall aim of the draft and how it sets out to achieve it. We are keen that this document should be adopted as a WG item. If it were to be adopted we would suggest that the filename be altered to reflect the changed emphasis of the draft by altering "-rcv-cheat" to "-rcv-compliance". Toby ________________________________________________________________________ ____ Toby Moncaster, <toby.moncaster@bt.com> Networks Research Centre, BT Research B54/70 Adastral Park, Martlesham Heath, Ipswich, IP53RE, UK. +44 1473 648734
_______________________________________________ tcpm mailing list tcpm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
- [tcpm] Updated draft-tcpm-moncaster-tcp-rcv-cheat… toby.moncaster
- Re: [tcpm] Updated draft-tcpm-moncaster-tcp-rcv-c… Andre Oppermann
- RE: [tcpm] Updated draft-tcpm-moncaster-tcp-rcv-c… toby.moncaster