IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] initcwnd updates?

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 18 March 2024 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FEB6C180B79 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.326
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.326 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tavOc2uHQJui for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56592C18DBA0 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BNt26Xw5lQs0BpaA/gJkJlaRDR5GwRy8UbEr9wBDq6E=; b=RtMFXrv0A8ltJJr3+nJVmSl7t+ Hxi60etmWgDpho4dpWWLxontC7lJdgrbwsFHU09WD6XeNrP2bHl4mPAJ0J7e4IphAMb481KUET8Z4 HaR+q3NMTH7Z1umDa9wBcg7xpBrCfxcuy0BvkEQ+3H0pLINpfXtYYGauTDWtjX5lx7JiLpNhL7txJ f6JrTtd3whX4dLNlm6RKblRl8dxVIx7KlmAyab+rWKIxFEes4aDtl3SwIJI4uJakAqt3EVZBK4PAn IqsXNh43iT8yQcFUIWfb1UoKJVqPYyzrCox7eTLxGsmkXcPMjR/ojA2XGyIJ1NRZwnDb986Vf/1ot 7Y1QVekw==;
Received: from [172.56.186.176] (port=14727 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1rmGB8-006HMV-1d; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 12:49:43 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <BEBA44D6-BA97-4144-9752-4E36E53976F4@icir.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 09:49:26 -0700
Cc: "Kampanakis, Panos" <kpanos=40amazon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, tcpm@ietf.org
Message-Id: <85303D4F-D589-4D37-ABA0-1550232270CD@strayalpha.com>
References: <BEBA44D6-BA97-4144-9752-4E36E53976F4@icir.org>
To: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21E219)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/GHEceasEcAERfxbBMaXqEsEM6ZM>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] initcwnd updates?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:49:49 -0000


> On Mar 18, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> wrote:
> 
> I find the high-order bit of RFC 9040 to be good.  But, I don't
> think the specifics hit the mark and/or are needed.

Sure - it was proposed when tighter control was expected. 

So is there a simpler approach we can extract from that appendix? IMO, it has the key needed properties at a high level - try bigger ones over time, learn from feedback, etc. 

Joe

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status