Re: [tcpm] STD 7, RFC 9293 on Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Thu, 18 August 2022 16:32 UTC
Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C725EC1524C0 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.606
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.606 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Egw6T0zn_hQB for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC395C1522D0 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id u14so2329490wrq.9 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=QQdSg02Sq26sqqLpzPFE2xWIYLDoQftEx0K67p/Pecg=; b=C5i9HBLryBTxXUg/Sn9wfrieQp1Sr27VAJFKDAsBdEg6Eg9/rrOtorWMd8HfXVEuKN AmseEYP6F1qfjLHz3Ne1NmjeJ7zGeHQ1CROogKoUYyJE1d3bhUdGYHpos9AL+y/yVK/q ANbfNSyxv6Rwpoov0Lycy529PV/oYFo7vtB+9BBi6huS2zXB2K4LDO4Ghik5OTQwdmVx uDspwbp8zUrpgeh8BbamfgBlkeXqziB0I9KOsrduOGsPwM6o0egwNCQUJ5gzS1SPEvX+ WKyGozXrULfQjyA0SzMVxejJGV1zZYhBRF5aFCSxkRhXzKhnpQHNzSWRuvTI/jrvssUg 3XKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=QQdSg02Sq26sqqLpzPFE2xWIYLDoQftEx0K67p/Pecg=; b=hrWlTY30bzVos8H7bD+bIyMD9lSL/xprIcgoGAPHiZg9yGc+0osTbiBRQ2wyGAgqc1 DrZv7G7WsWrsKRcRMhEjmA5kxSRY6MEBD5a1BZp92NZWefvh9fnOJsGLcn/vzu8tvxsG H4Cd532PxsJayDOFobkOOm28S6yYho7sxEYs+LNxV8dJO0FMH4g0zZ79cSsMVbxN80Gm ed/pbFvgT7rFgDA8rlzHdp1/ytngHoSJq68CAgLNgv+9tiOhyboxx5sU+mt9sjF8j4FY lN+YrZ0XrzwI3llnLiipmsZbVlakw5QXBPJDLiB6u8W0+/RT9s+jhtMQkDHi5fnjpNog 09GA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2LS2ynHO4ixoTduLKMk8GD6XVSxm1d6VhXlJH817MUWAto0d0i nscf4iqJzMCSKXCjcv1x7/NM2fKZ2igrYDmu46VGUw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7CuxI596yH8o2Lm0Br7kfyuijo7lGYzj+plI5OEWJHKl3yJLhYPfMmtPMyvb9+F/XXPrR+FyaBGlTiyl1Vhfg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:178b:b0:222:c6c4:b42e with SMTP id e11-20020a056000178b00b00222c6c4b42emr2233840wrg.275.1660840369560; Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220818135827.DF5931527DC@rfcpa.amsl.com> <A513B72C-D683-4200-994D-6B7971CE61EF@ericsson.com> <d0927c28-0214-9a91-c967-03aed08a40b5@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <d0927c28-0214-9a91-c967-03aed08a40b5@mti-systems.com>
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 09:32:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=fAhApUf_x=Fn0R7RTEjiNxYSEp-smPa9oKLndf6Jm5eg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000041f40405e6868846"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Hqh1WwsgTrtU-vD6EC2Qq03qT6I>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] STD 7, RFC 9293 on Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:32:56 -0000
Excellent milestone indeed. Kudos to Wes! On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:20 AM Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> wrote: > Thank you! I'm pretty sure I remember at IETF 88 in Vancouver (2013) > estimating that this work might take about a year. :) > > Many people contributed, and I should also point out that near the end > the RFC Editor staff did a really nice job tuning some of the formatting > and converting some of the ASCII art tables into proper XML2RFC tables > (in addition to a lot of other work they did). That might make 9293bis > a bit easier for someone 30 years from now. > > > On 8/18/2022 10:01 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind wrote: > > Yeah! Thanks Wes! > > > > > > > > On 18.08.22, 16:00, "IETF-Announce on behalf of > rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of > rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > > STD 7 > > RFC 9293 > > > > Title: Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) > > Author: W. Eddy, Ed. > > Status: Standards Track > > Stream: IETF > > Date: August 2022 > > Mailbox: wes@mti-systems.com > > Pages: 98 > > Obsoletes: RFC 793, RFC 879, RFC 2873, RFC 6093, > > RFC 6429, RFC 6528, RFC 6691 > > Updates: RFC 1011, RFC 1122, RFC 5961 > > See Also: STD 7 > > > > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-28.txt > > > > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9293 > > > > DOI: 10.17487/RFC9293 > > > > This document specifies the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP). > TCP > > is an important transport-layer protocol in the Internet protocol > > stack, and it has continuously evolved over decades of use and > growth > > of the Internet. Over this time, a number of changes have been made > > to TCP as it was specified in RFC 793, though these have only been > > documented in a piecemeal fashion. This document collects and > brings > > those changes together with the protocol specification from RFC 793. > > This document obsoletes RFC 793, as well as RFCs 879, 2873, 6093, > > 6429, 6528, and 6691 that updated parts of RFC 793. It updates RFCs > > 1011 and 1122, and it should be considered as a replacement for the > > portions of those documents dealing with TCP requirements. It also > > updates RFC 5961 by adding a small clarification in reset handling > > while in the SYN-RECEIVED state. The TCP header control bits from > > RFC 793 have also been updated based on RFC 3168. > > > > This document is a product of the TCP Maintenance and Minor > Extensions Working Group of the IETF. > > > > This is now an Internet Standard. > > > > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and > suggestions > > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the > Official > > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) > for the > > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of > this > > memo is unlimited. > > > > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-43d34bb74fdd53e0&q=1&e=518134fd-4f57-4fc2-970d-7d09af789a55&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fietf-announce > > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist > > > > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk > > > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. > Unless > > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > > unlimited distribution. > > > > > > The RFC Editor Team > > Association Management Solutions, LLC > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IETF-Announce mailing list > > IETF-Announce@ietf.org > > > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=31323334-501d5122-313273af-454445555731-43d34bb74fdd53e0&q=1&e=518134fd-4f57-4fc2-970d-7d09af789a55&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fietf-announce > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tcpm mailing list > > tcpm@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm > > _______________________________________________ > tcpm mailing list > tcpm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm >
- [tcpm] STD 7, RFC 9293 on Transmission Control Pr… rfc-editor
- Re: [tcpm] STD 7, RFC 9293 on Transmission Contro… Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: [tcpm] STD 7, RFC 9293 on Transmission Contro… Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tcpm] STD 7, RFC 9293 on Transmission Contro… Yuchung Cheng
- Re: [tcpm] STD 7, RFC 9293 on Transmission Contro… Neal Cardwell
- Re: [tcpm] STD 7, RFC 9293 on Transmission Contro… Scharf, Michael