[tcpm] SCTP socket API section needed for rto-restart?
Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se> Tue, 24 March 2015 15:05 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=052525fd4a=anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8301A87C1; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.951
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.951 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGicXRcr1_lC; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nasse.dc.kau.se (smtp.kau.se [193.10.220.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8A71A87B1; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 08:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Spam-Processed: mail.kau.se, Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:05:07 +0100 (not processed: spam filter heuristic analysis disabled)
X-MDRemoteIP: 31.133.156.104
X-MDArrival-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:05:07 +0100
X-Authenticated-Sender: anna.brunstrom@kau.se
X-Return-Path: anna.brunstrom@kau.se
X-Envelope-From: anna.brunstrom@kau.se
Message-ID: <55117D21.9030708@kau.se>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:05:05 +0100
From: Anna Brunstrom <anna.brunstrom@kau.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/IE4LUf1m5MeqIKEXSLKdP4Agu0M>
Subject: [tcpm] SCTP socket API section needed for rto-restart?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:05:38 -0000
Dear all, In the tcpm session just now there was a discussion as to weather a SCTP socket API section should be added to the rto-restart draft or not. As there was no consensus in the room, we would like feedback from the mailing list. As tsvwg handles SCTP, the question goes to both the tcpm and the tsvwg mailing lists. The draft is at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-rtorestart-05, and describes a small update to the RTO timer management algorithm. Any other feedback on the document is of course also welcome. Thanks, Anna
- [tcpm] SCTP socket API section needed for rto-res… Anna Brunstrom
- Re: [tcpm] SCTP socket API section needed for rto… Michael Tuexen