[tcpm] TCPM status
"Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 28 March 2012 09:21 UTC
Return-Path: <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD1A21E80FA for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:21:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.871
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.871 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.378, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TrEGSRTn0pRi for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5192321E809E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q2S9Jn9K031204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:20:59 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSE3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.55]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:20:22 +0200
From: "Scharf, Michael (Michael)" <michael.scharf@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 11:20:20 +0200
Thread-Topic: TCPM status
Thread-Index: Ac0Mw/9bhtBYlbSjQZeWQEofuwDmqA==
Message-ID: <2A886F9088894347A3BE0CC5B7A85F3E88E443F202@FRMRSSXCHMBSE3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: [tcpm] TCPM status
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:21:10 -0000
Hi all, Below the usual update regarding the current TCPM status. Please let the chairs know any comments or feedback. Thanks Michael PS: I apologize for attending this IETF only on Friday. Recent RFCs =========== Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition draft-ietf-tcpm-persist Status: RFC 6429 Defending Against Sequence Number Attacks draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc1948bis Status: RFC 6528 WG Items Nearing RFC Publication ================================ The NewReno Modification to TCP's Fast Recovery Algorithm draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc3782-bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2011 Status: RFC Editor Queue (RFC 6582) SACK Entry / RFC 3517bis draft-blanton-tcpm-3517bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010 Status: IESG processing WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC ============================================ MSS Option draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 Status: Needs revision Action: Update with post-WGLC comments in preparation Active WG Items =============== 1323bis draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009 Status: Needs revision Action: Action with David Borman TCP Security draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security Milestone Target: August 2010 Status: Version -03 with reduced scope (informational) Action: Discussion during IETF 83 Increasing the Initial Window draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd Milestone Target: Experimental in September 2011 Status: Under active discussion / review Action: WGLC planned Proportional Rate Reduction for TCP draft-ietf-tcpm-proportional-rate-reduction Milestone Target: Experimental in May 2012 Status: Under active discussion / review Action: WGLC planned Shared Use of Experimental TCP Options draft-ietf-tcpm-experimental-options Milestone Target: PS in Sept. 2012 Status: Under active discussion / review Action: Continue discussion on list TCP Fast Open draft-ietf-tcpm-fastopen Milestone Target: Experimental in Sept. 2012 Status: Under active discussion / review Action: Continue discussion Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items ========================================= Active Internet-Drafts ====================== draft-ananth-tcpm-tcpoptext draft-hurtig-tcpm-rtorestart draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-accurate-ecn draft-kuehlewind-tcpm-accurate-ecn-option draft-mathis-tcpm-tcp-laminar draft-scheffenegger-tcpm-timestamp-negotiation draft-touch-tcpm-automatic-iw (+ many expired Internet-Drafts) Other WG Activities =================== Errata Review for legacy TCP RFCs (many outstanding)
- [tcpm] TCPM status Scharf, Michael (Michael)
- [tcpm] TCPM status Pasi Sarolahti
- [tcpm] TCPM status Pasi Sarolahti