Re: [tcpm] PoC for draft-moncaster-tcpm-rcv-cheat-02

David Malone <David.Malone@nuim.ie> Wed, 26 March 2008 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B183028C790; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.707
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.707 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.270, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J1A9eFEq31wu; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F6A28C3B2; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF7F28C375 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X2kma5qw6RPH for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kac.cnri.dit.ie (unknown [IPv6:2001:770:68:ff::1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2352C3A6F78 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kac.cnri.dit.ie (localhost.cnri.dit.ie [127.0.0.1]) by kac.cnri.dit.ie (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m2QKKjQ8001227; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:20:45 GMT (envelope-from dwmalone@kac.cnri.dit.ie)
Message-Id: <200803262020.m2QKKjQ8001227@kac.cnri.dit.ie>
To: Jakob Heitz <jheitz@redback.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:05:27 MST." <47EAAC87.2090606@redback.com>
From: David Malone <David.Malone@nuim.ie>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:20:45 +0000
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] PoC for draft-moncaster-tcpm-rcv-cheat-02
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

> So I suggest as a defense, if you receive an ack of
> the future, to halve the congestion window.

In the demo at:

	http://www.hamilton.ie/gavinmc/drop_dupack_attack/

Gavin only acked packets that were sent - there is no need to ack
into the future.

	David.
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm